Forloh BTM Pant review posted ---> now traveling pants to try

On with the brotherhood of the traveling pants. Thanks to @sndmn11 for his generosity in shipping these to me.

The best comparison I had was to my Pyke Tongass pants. I wouldn’t call these overly similar, but close enough in terms of purpose.

For the record, I’m 6’ 200ish (currently @208 because of too much ice cream) with a 34-35” waist. My Tongass pants are a 36 with the inseam let out all the way to a 34”.

My apologies for the poor lighting in the photos.

Tongass pants

IMG_2799.jpegIMG_2800.jpegIMG_2801.jpegIMG_2803.jpeg

Yes, they always look like I have a load in my pants

The Forloh BTM


IMG_2804.jpegIMG_2805.jpegIMG_2806.jpegIMG_2807.jpegIMG_2808.jpegIMG_2809.jpeg

The last two picture of the BTM are with a medium weight base layer on. Fit was fine, especially with the stretch material.

Facing fabric on the Forloh is heavier and more robust. The Pyke are lighter but not necessarily more comfortable

I would need a 34” inseam in the Forloh (these are 32”). They ride okay on my boots, but with steep climbing I think they would ride up and allow debris in my boots. Forloh really should add a boot hook and suspender loops/buttons. And trim the waist down. A 34” would be too snug for my preference.

Who wants these to try on next? @TSAMP
 
On with the brotherhood of the traveling pants. Thanks to @sndmn11 for his generosity in shipping these to me.

The best comparison I had was to my Pyke Tongass pants. I wouldn’t call these overly similar, but close enough in terms of purpose.

For the record, I’m 6’ 200ish (currently @208 because of too much ice cream) with a 34-35” waist. My Tongass pants are a 36 with the inseam let out all the way

Who wants these to try on next? @TSAMP
So these are 36? Im a 32/34 with chicken legs and no butt.
 
Back
Top