FFP Mil hunting scope options

Mbell91

FNG
Joined
Sep 28, 2025
Messages
5
Hey there im new to the thread but I was hoping to get some feedback on good FFP MiL hunting scopes.

This scope will be setting on a PH3 7prc, and will be used for elk hunting in the northwest. I will be packing it in wooded mountain terrain with clear cuts and shooting from 100 to 700yds. 700 is obviously a risky shot but I would like the option.

I would like something between a 3.5 or 4 on the low end and 16 to 25 high end, around 30oz, would prefer under but I know that difficult to find. This is a forever scope so im willing to spend NF money but not TT money. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
 
Check out the Maven

RS1.2 - 2.5-15x44 FFP or a Trijicon Tenmile 3-18x44​


Maven is one of the favorites here
awesome thank you! Are both of these decently sturdy and track well if I did take a spill on the mountain? Im hoping that wont be the case but you never know.
 
Yes, Form and others have drop tested many scopes. These 2 along with others have passed. There's other good options as well. These are just 2 of the good ones that are ffp and mils.
 
My choices would be:

4-16x44 ATACR F1 MIL-R
3–15x42 SWFA Gen 2 Milquad
Maven RS 1.2 2.5-15 MIL
the Atacr was my first pick, but I have heard mixed reviews on CS, not that I would need it on a NF but it was still a concern. thank you for the suggestions.
 
You cant go wrong with NF products. However, for the cost, I really like the Maven and the reticle is a bit better IMO for straight hunting purposes. I don't think you'd go wrong with a NX8 4x32, the ATACR, or the Maven. All will be rock solid.
 
the Atacr was my first pick, but I have heard mixed reviews on CS, not that I would need it on a NF but it was still a concern. thank you for the suggestions.
Every person I know that has used NF warranty has had good luck. Not sure what exactly you are reading.

I have 2 RS1.2s and 2 SWFA 3-15. I’d take a 4-16 ATACR before both any day. I prefer the glass and feature set of the RS1.2 more than the SWFAs. I’m not 100% sold on the 3-15 SWFAs. They work and are nice enough but not a lifetime optic for me.
 
the Atacr was my first pick, but I have heard mixed reviews on CS, not that I would need it on a NF but it was still a concern. thank you for the suggestions.
I’ve had one experience with CS on a scope I bought 2nd hand and it was excellent service. Issue with illumination fixed and well as a lens replaced due to a damaged spot in the coatings.

No cost and had it back reasonably. Even provided a new spud cloth and scope tool.
 
the Atacr was my first pick, but I have heard mixed reviews on CS, not that I would need it on a NF but it was still a concern. thank you for the suggestions.
I’ve only had to use NF customer service once, it was on a used NF NX8, the previous owner way over torqued the zero stop screws. They were incredibly easy to work with and even put a fresh coating on the scope to cover up the ware marks on it.
 
You cant go wrong with NF products. However, for the cost, I really like the Maven and the reticle is a bit better IMO for straight hunting purposes. I don't think you'd go wrong with a NX8 4x32, the ATACR, or the Maven. All will be rock solid.
I have narrowed it down to either the trijicon tenmile or the Atacr. I like the reticle and weight on the tenmile more than the Atacr but from reading the forums the Atacr seems to be the gold standard in this category.
 
I’ve only had to use NF customer service once, it was on a used NF NX8, the previous owner way over torqued the zero stop screws. They were incredibly easy to work with and even put a fresh coating on the scope to cover up the ware marks on it.
I have had both sportsman and cabelas employees inform me they had issues with them, but I take their words with a grain of salt. It is reassuring that there is so many positive reviews from the community saying they are good. I want to thank everyone for their input its been a big help.
 
I have had both sportsman and cabelas employees inform me they had issues with them, but I take their words with a grain of salt. It is reassuring that there is so many positive reviews from the community saying they are good. I want to thank everyone for their input its been a big help.
I would tone out anything a cabelas or sportsman’s “expert” tells you, just as a general rule.
 
Back
Top