Favorite Terrain Features

Also in East central Missouri. I love the long, narrow ridges where the power lines are. That and creek crossings.
 
Eastern Pa here. I look for edges where open timber transitions to thicker brushy areas, especially if it’s a ridge top.
 
Western Arkansas hunter here.

My most productive spots have been pinch points between two drainage heads, with one drainage on either side of a main ridge system with the drainages running perpendicular to the ridge. The area on top of the ridge between these two drainages tends to be a saddle as well, and often it will funnel deer into that area. They will still cross the drainages further down the mountain on either side though, so its not a fool-proof method.

I will say that these areas are not always productive year after year. It must be dependent on the food in the surrounding areas. Some years, Ill put a camera in this type of area and will get a lot of really nice deer. The next year, Ill put the camera in the same tree and get practically nothing. The only thing I can think is that the food dries up in that area and they move elsewhere. I try to find similar characteristics in other areas, but its not as common as you might think.
 
Clear cuts.
Swamp edges, and cricks, streams, etc….
In new areas I always start with clear cuts and water.
Then the hard edges as has been mentioned.
Always seem to find sign at the tops of drainages as well.
 
Don’t really have a favorite but always looking for compounding terrain features near bedding. Steeper and thicker is always good
 
Western Arkansas hunter here.

My most productive spots have been pinch points between two drainage heads, with one drainage on either side of a main ridge system with the drainages running perpendicular to the ridge. The area on top of the ridge between these two drainages tends to be a saddle as well, and often it will funnel deer into that area. They will still cross the drainages further down the mountain on either side though, so its not a fool-proof method.

I will say that these areas are not always productive year after year. It must be dependent on the food in the surrounding areas. Some years, Ill put a camera in this type of area and will get a lot of really nice deer. The next year, Ill put the camera in the same tree and get practically nothing. The only thing I can think is that the food dries up in that area and they move elsewhere. I try to find similar characteristics in other areas, but its not as common as you might think.
I have one spot like this in Iowa. During the rut, it is the best stand I have ever hunted. The terrain here is micro compared to mountains, but there is 75' to 100' of drop on both sides. The thread is interesting. Iowa is nearly all private land. I don't get to look for specific features and hunt there. I have to look at the features I have available to hunt and figure out how to best utilize them. Finding a big picture funnel and then moving in and finding a micro-funnel close by is the name of the game for archery hunting.
 
If I’m on controlled access private I look at all the classic spots.

Primary saddles with large draws heading on both sides are always worth a look.

2-3 ridges intersecting.

Large benches with a hard funnel on one or both ends are good too.



When I’m on pubelick land though it seems all these “classic” places get hunted or at least get a lot of human traffic. And it doesn’t seem to matter how far back in they are anymore, there’s gonna be people there.

So I look more for secondary features just off the “good looking” feature.

I don’t see near as many deer anymore. But I see more mature bucks.
 
Back
Top