Ethics Question: Do you notch your tag if you shoot an animal but can't recover it?

Do you notch your tag if you made a bad shot and can't recover/find the animal?

  • Yes

    Votes: 60 26.0%
  • No

    Votes: 101 43.7%
  • Depends on the hunt

    Votes: 70 30.3%

  • Total voters
    231
I expend every effort to find wounded game, and if I can’t find it, I hunt on if it is legal and allowed.
 
If using my bow and I find my arrow with no blood on it, then I will continue to hunt.

If I cannot find my arrow, I have blood and can't locate the animal; my hunt is over, the tag is notched. There is no way to say 100% that that animal will not die from my shot later from infection or be weakened to the point that it cannot survive predators or the winter. Again, the tag would be notched.

Using a smaller caliber rifle, I can spot my shots and can see the animal's reaction to a hit. If I cannot find the animal, I notch my tag.

Using a Muzzle loader is the most challenging because I cannot spot the shot and often cannot see the animal's reaction. As a result, I rely on blood and tracking. However, I only shoot animals within my effective range, so I assume I've hit it, so my tag is noctched, whether I find the animal or not.
 
It’s the law in Canada to notch your tag even if you don’t recover the animal. From birds to big game.

You must be from Ontario, speaking on behalf of the whole country like you’re in the centre of the universe lol.


The only province the guys on this forum really want to hunt is BC, and in BC you’d be BREAKING the law if you cut a tag and didn’t possess the animal.

You can NOT cut a tag if you don’t find it no matter what your feelings tell you to do.

Direct quote from the regs “

What to Avoid:

  • Do not cut the tag:Cutting a tag on an unrecovered animal is not a permitted action and can result in penalties.



Please don’t speak on behalf of the entire country. You’ll give people terrible advice that will ruin their hunt.
 
I’ve seen some folks mentioning wounding an animal….not recovering the animal. Then continuing to hunt. My question is how many do you have to wound before you stop ?
If wounding and/or not recovering game is a regular occurrence, a person should really be stopping and thinking about what they may or may not be doing to cause it. If this is an event that is happening to you more than once or twice every few years (and that is probably being generous), I'd wager you're making some decisions that YOU can alter that can prevent it from happening in the first place. At that point, I think your priorities are a little messed up if your concern is "How many is too many?".
 
You must be from Ontario, speaking on behalf of the whole country like you’re in the centre of the universe lol.


The only province the guys on this forum really want to hunt is BC, and in BC you’d be BREAKING the law if you cut a tag and didn’t possess the animal.
You must be from BC, speaking on behalf of Rokslide like you're the centre of the universe. Lol.

BC is not the only province that guys on this forum want to hunt.

Alberta is more appealing to me because even as a non-resident alien I can hunt it under their hunter host system with a mate that lives there. Can basically DIY it.

Not so for BC. You have to have your hand held by a guide even if you live in Canada but not BC. That's a turn off.
 
Nope. Only lost or thought i lost one deer looked for hours small dots of blood. Then carried on hunting. Deer was then seen two days later running does.
 
I once shot a sheep that died and starting rolling down a face and ended up in a location that was unrecoverable. Tried to get to him but was unable to do it safely without serious risk of ending up in the same state. I walked away and notched my tag. My hunt was over. The outfitter offered to keep hunting but I declined as I harvested a sheep. The outfitter and guide were very appreciative and respected my decision. I had an even better hunt when I rebooked the same hunt in the following years.
 
If wounding and/or not recovering game is a regular occurrence, a person should really be stopping and thinking about what they may or may not be doing to cause it.
Good point. Deciding whether to pull the trigger or wait for a better shot opportunity is a more important ethical decision in my opinion.
 
Good point. Deciding whether to pull the trigger or wait for a better shot opportunity is a more important ethical decision in my opinion.
We’re all human. We all make mistakes. Bullets can fail. A stick that we didn’t see is in the way, we misjudged distance. Maybe we rushed a shot we shouldn’t have. Many things can contribute to a wounded and/or unrecovered animal. Some of them are preventable, some are not. However, if you’re regularly wounding critters and not making changes, then any “ethics” discussion is null and void. At that point you’re demonstrating that you don’t actually care about the animal.
 
No, but the 2 times it happened to me I did not have the stomach to continue hunting. Once on an elk and the 1st on a young WT. Just couldn't get back after it.

These days it would depend if I kept hunting or not.
A nice muley that got away, nope not shooting at an other.
Elk, yes- we have too many where we hunt. I'll have multiple elk tags in my pocket this year as always.

Good point on the legality of notching a tag when you didn't actually kill the animal. I think it is more of a keep hunting question, not notching the tag.
 
Back
Top