Lol I mean the guy is just doing his job. I know it sucks feeling the scrutiny of someone, but I'm sure he would have just given a warning if it was something minor.
NO... his job... is to RESPOND to MY call.
NOT use responding to MY call as an opportunity to see if he can slap financial hardship onto me.
Take a sec and see for yourself! DFG officers have some of the broadest powers available! They can go ahead and search thru your vehicle and anything in there and do not need a warrant!
Something that's been bugging me is... he asked to see my weapons, that were ALREADY IN the case!
Now think about this. Lots of open friendly conversation. Told him I got my limit, then I just wanted to re sight-in the .223 since I've already made this long 100mi drive for the doves. You can clearly see the Target in my backseat. It's obvious the bullet holes are from somebody sighting-in, not all grouped. I do know he could have sighted me for performing the sight-in there, because you're only allowed to use firearms for hunting purposes when you're in any place that's considered part of the NF. But it's like.. I live 4mi from the coast. I don't have anyplace near me to do a 100yd sight-in. Closest place I know of is Raahauges in Riverside.
Think about it.... exactly WHAT... would he gain... by being able to SEE my firearms? Eh? The firearms don't dictate whether or not it's lead-free, right? I'm NOT Actively in the pursuit of game now, I'm over somewhere completely different, now for a different purpose.
He wanted to check if the shotgun had the magazine limited to the 3 rounds. (Again, to see if we could make money for the state, Which he could've just f*cking asked me. But even then... what does it matter? There's NO WAY he could have even proved I took these Dove (at an entirely different location, mind you) with THAT shotgun. I totally could have met up with somebody at the event... borrowed their gun for the day.
EDIT: Re gun-plug for shells, I also certainly could have opted to remove it after leaving that other spot too. So what would that prove? Nothing.
You know... like let's say I'm ignorant, just bought the shotgun and thought I'd go hunt with it. I get there... some other hunter tells me "Dude, the magazine has to be limited, and you don't even have the right chokes!" So then I'd be like "Aw maaaan. Eh.. do you guys happen to have a spare?" THEN... I go and run into THIS Yahoo... whom I'm asking for immediate help to a specific issue... and he's all wanting to see my weapons and sh*t? If I was that ignorant dude that hadn't yet limited the mag, etc. This guy would TOTALLY have cited him. And I mean.. unless that gun was freshly cleaned or something... whenever it's your word vs some kinda LEO's.. YOUR words aren't worth a sh*t to the law. You know... because this other yahoo over here "took an oath". Pssh... I'd be willing to bet every bank-robber in the world would be totally willing to "take an oath" and wouldn't bat an eyelash at it.