Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's one issue with that math for total wound volume. One would need to account for the profile shape of the wound width, not just base it on the maximum width.
For example, the width of the mono's wound decreases much slower than the others, and according to ballistic gel tests is often wider at the end.
I am referencing this comparison in ballistic gel. The 127 and 160 LRX have the better width after 10-12”.This is correct- however, “wound width” after it exits an animal isn’t generally helpful.
This is not correct unless it yaws.
Thanks for the informationNope. They’re different- all of them. The wound shapes are or can be quite different.
Depth of penetration:
Monos> TGK (maybe)> Partition> Accubond/NBT> TMK> ELD-M (lot dependent)> ELD-X (lot dependent)> Gold Dot/Fusion> VLD> SST (lot dependent)
Max width of wounds:
VLD/SST (lot dependent)> TMK> Partition> ELD-X (lot dependent)> ELD-M (lot dependent)> Gold Dot/Fusion> NBT/Accubond> TGK> monos
Consistency and total volume of wounds (maximized for the first 16-18” of penetration:
TMK> Partition (bullet dependent)> Gold Dot/Fusion> ELD-X (lot dependent)> ELD-M (lot dependent)> NBT/Accubond> TGK> Mono
The most variable in behavior from bullet to bullet and lot to lot are the monos- though their wounds are generally narrow and failure to fully upset is harder to notice; the ELD-M and X’s- some lots create very wide wounds, some feature long and deep wounds with modest width (though the M’s much more so than the X’s in this case), and VLD’s.
All of the above is at “normal” impact velocities and lower (I.E.- 2,700-2,800’ish to 1,800’ish fps).
Thanks for the information
With a Tikka 223 with a 1” in 8” bbl which Gold Dot would be preferred for white tail deer under 300 yards, or is it just the one that shot the best in the rifle?
Thanks