I have digiscoped in the past with Swaro and several different camera bodies as well as won some awards for wildlife photography with normal gear. If you are already carrying the scope and the tripod, then the small connector to hook up a phone or small camera is not a signifcant money or weight investment. But I never got good at it - requires a very steady tripod, careful focusing technique and a lot of envrionmental factors to use the extreme magnification - minimal wind, low heat distortion, etc. While I got pictures to share/document what I saw, nothing was of the quality that I would want to frame on the wall. A lot fo the best Digiscoping images (those that win the awards) seem to be shot with Panasonic Cameras, Swaro scopes, heavy tripods and the scope is outfitted with a lower poer fixed image eyepiece like 15x-20x.
As an alternative consideration, a person could purchase a Nikon P1000 and get an equivalent 60x spotting scope magnification through the lens with no scope, and also have Autofocus, Image Stabilization and much more control over Aperature an shutter speed making it much easier to capture images. The P1000 still wont compete with the IQ of a DSLR and large lens, but for me, I got a lot more keepers with a lot less learning curve, and I can carry the camera/lens combo in a single compact case that was much easier to deploy.
Which panasonic cameras?
Which
What’s the benefits of digiscoping aside from taking cool pictures? I’m interested in this, I keep seeing mentions about it all over the place.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk