Definitive arrow study-Yates/Litke

[fatlander]

I'm not questing this. I've done this plenty of times. The arrow sounds cool.

I'm questing a testing lab sensitive enough to distinguish the difference between AAE vanes and Flex Fletch vanes from an audio/sound/decibel standpoint. Reading the suppressor testing, it seems far fetched. But I'm not an audio testing guy. Maybe things that are quieter are easier to measure accurately?

It would be easy as any other sound scientific test, pun intended. Repeat the test under the same conditions, multiple times, and see what the results say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[dreamingWest]

It would be easy as any other sound scientific test, pun intended. Repeat the test under the same conditions, multiple times, and see what the results say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://www.precisioncutarchery.com/research/arrow-study-2026/methods/components-acoustics

This sounds likes like a legit sound test!
Shame on my skepticism.

 

[fatlander]

https://www.precisioncutarchery.com/research/arrow-study-2026/methods/components-acoustics

This sounds likes like a legit sound test!
Shame on my skepticism.

Yes it’s a very well designed study, but if the results can’t be replicated, it doesn’t really matter. The only way to know if it’s replicable is to do it again, and again, and again . . . That’s how hypothesis move to theories.


I think that’s what we’ve seen with varying differences in outcomes you’ve noted in suppressor testing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Tilzbow]

I would be curious to know how much weight the brain trust puts on the sound of the fletchings and broadheads. I have a hard time seeing the fletchings and broadheads making a huge difference since the sound of the bow is so much louder. Just standing down range I hear the bow and not the arrows. I think an animal is going to react to the initial shot noise of the bow. I have heard Bill Vanderheyden and others say similar things. Maybe a long shot, say 70 yards? Whitetails react as soon as the bow goes off. I have never had an opportunity to shoot a bow at anything else, but will be chasing elks again this fall hoping to change that.

I once shot at a jack rabbit at about 120 yards, witnessed by several other guys at a 3d league. Field point, Blazer vanes. Dang thing must’ve heard the arrow, looked up, then ran away just before the arrow hit. Probably an instinctive response to the sound to avoid a bird of prey.

I can’t remember ever shooting at a large animal that actually heard, saw and moved out of the way of the arrow like that rabbit appeared to.

 

[BBob]

I can’t remember ever shooting at a large animal that actually heard, saw and moved out of the way of the arrow like that rabbit appeared to.

Pronghorn are notorious for doing just that.

 

[Fire_9]

I once shot at a jack rabbit at about 120 yards, witnessed by several other guys at a 3d league. Field point, Blazer vanes. Dang thing must’ve heard the arrow, looked up, then ran away just before the arrow hit. Probably an instinctive response to the sound to avoid a bird of prey.

I can’t remember ever shooting at a large animal that actually heard, saw and moved out of the way of the arrow like that rabbit appeared to.

I've had it happen once on a raghorn bull. Head down feeding and completely ducked the arrow at 40 yards. Elk are not known for doing that and I chalked it up to pulling the shot even though it felt really good. A couple years later I started paying attention to arrow noise and the head that I was shooting at that bull was extremely loud. Incredibly noticeable once I started paying attention to it. It was a vented 2 blade ashby head and I've pretty well sworn off vented heads because of it. May not be a huge issue but it sure as hell can't hurt to have a quiet arrow