Rokslide is (I like to think) the gathering place for ethical hunters. When we as a group have a problem with a hunting situation/scenario we speak out. This is self policing and I believe it is valuable to our community.
I would not allow a hunter to shoot that doe. I believe it is very important to impart hunting wisdom and ethics to young hunters to guide them toward good decision choices once they are fully immersed as outdoors-men & women. I would have them refrain from taking certain animals in certain situations and explain my reasons-which you may or may not agree with.
There are many scenarios that will play out later in life for young hunters and I believe it matters how we help form their approach to these future events. Example-a young hunter comes across a less than desirable (but fully legal) animal but this animal is injured and clearly not going to make it much longer. If the hunter harvest the injured animal and fills their tag they forego the opportunity for a "trophy" animal. This is an ethical dilemma where I would ask the hunter to take the injured animal. It is not an easy call but it builds character to guide future decisions and actions.
Kudos to you for getting your daughter afield. I would simply disagree with this harvest but if the deer is processed and consumed we have to live with it
Don't take offense to others that disagree here-it is much better for us as brothers & sisters to hash things out in our community as opposed to the general public. Trust me- we will have your back if a group of non-hunters viewed this and went into attack mode but we want to promote a higher morale ground overall for the hook & bullet crowd.
I appreciate your thoughts. I honestly do. You are respectful and thoughtful. However,
With regard to not allowing a hunter to shoot that doe, that is the point.... I was not asking for anyone's opinions on whether I should have allowed my daughter to shoot that doe. I wasn't asking whether you agree or disagree, There is nothing to discuss... It was a legal deer, during a legal season, with a variety of solid, game management reasons as to why I am more than willing to shoot a doe with fawns at this time of year on this particular property. There are many contributing factors to why one makes the decision they do in the field, and it is not my obligation to go through the multitude of reasons why I chose to allow (and encourage) my daughter to take that particular, very legal, deer. My reason for posting was not in an effort to have the ethics police hand me their decisions on what they would do, or why I was in the wrong. I have been in this game a very, very long time, and I have a thorough understanding of game management, ethics, and legality. While I understand, and agree with your point regarding teaching good values to young hunters, and ethical dilemmas, this, by far, does not fall under that category. I have already laid out clearly and concisely why I stand where I stand on this particular issue. I am not interested in re-stating it again. However, I will re-state that I was not expecting people on a hunting forum to make emotional, anthropomorphic statements about me and my 13 year old daughter being "heartless hunters". That is laughable to the point of absurd.
The idea of a higher morale ground is a subjective one to say the least. What you view as immoral I may view as moral. That is where the laws and regulations come into play. This case is about a young lady's first deer with a bow, with a legal tag, in a legal season, in an area so overrun with deer that the ranchers and farmers will drop 30 of them with a rifle during February due to the amount of damage they are causing. (and FWP doesn't bat an eye, and has actually encouraged them to do so at times!!!) We, as hunters, hold these animals in high regard, much in part due to the fact that they are the resource we love to pursue. (Also a moral dilemma to some, as we kill the very thing we love).... But... to a rancher or farmer that feeds his family, and to a greater degree the world at large, these animals are no more valuable than a gopher, and in many ways more destructive. We, as hunters, do not own the corner on these animals, and quite frankly neither does the state. The land they live on, the food they eat, are owned by the farmer and ranchers. Very often our perspective as hunters is just as much skewed as the non-hunting public's when held up to the lens of perspective and needs of the farmer/rancher.
While I respect your point on hashing things out amongst ourselves, that too is a fine line. Sure, there are scenarios that are good to have healthy debate over, but we also are our own worst enemy at times and play the part of a cannibal, eating our own. I make no apologies for being a killer, and training my children to be the same, much like a mother lioness teaching her cubs, and at times having to hold the zebra down while the cub chokes the life out of it. We are predators, and a part of nature. I honestly could care way less about a group of non-hunters attacking me than a group here on a hunting forum. I expect it from an uneducated, spineless, effeminate, disconnected-from-reality public that thinks meat comes from a grocery store, or worse yet, that one should not eat meat at all. However, I am disheartened and disappointed to see it from my fellow hunting community who should know better. As atman put it "be better"....
Your statement "I would simply disagree with this harvest, but if the deer is processed and consumed we have to live with it" speaks volumes. I don't care if you can "live with it". I wasn't asking if you could "live with it", I wasn't looking for an opinion, nor did my post warrant it. You are free to NOT shoot just as I, and my daughter, are free TO shoot. It is not an ethical or moral question, particularly when you understand times, seasons, deer behavior, and management practices specific to a particular area. I would venture most of you do not live in rural Montana, particularly Eastern Montana with way over objective deer numbers. I am very serious, if any of you stated your sentiments to pretty much any local rancher/farmer they would scoff and show you the door. You guys are just disconnected from reality and have made these animals your modern day idol.
Any of you can choose to not shoot a doe with fawns if you wish. That is your God given, American freedom-loving choice. I respect that, but ask the same of you. This is not a moral debate, anymore than a vegan trying to tell me I am immoral for eating meat.