Choosing powder...

Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
3,690
Location
Western Iowa
Hey guys, dropped off barrel and dummy round for my 6.5x300WSM at the smith today. I've been running several simuations on Gordon's, and I've narrowed my initial load development powders to the following under a 147 ELDM at 3.094" COL and 24.3" barrel.

  • IMR 7828 SSC
    • 68 grains max load
    • 3,178 MV
    • 95.8% load ratio with 100% burn rate
  • H4831
    • 67.5 grains max load
    • 3,121 MV
    • 98.1% load ratio with 100% burn rate
  • N565
    • 70.5 grains max load
    • 3,196 MV
    • 100.3% load ratio with 100% burn rate
Obviously these are max loads, and I would work up to them (hopefully). Given these choices, do you choose the N565 due to its superior case fill and velocity, or do you go with the IMR 7828 SSC since it's more efficient and just a hair slower? Or do you go with H4831 as a happy middle ground? I don't think a guy can really go wrong here, just looking for any feedback or experience.

Thank you in advance!
 

TxLite

WKR
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,101
Location
Texas
Personally I’d choose the N565. It seems like it maximizes the use of the case. If it doesn’t like that I’d try the 4831.

7828 is not temperature stable so I wouldn’t roll with that one if you intend to shoot long range or in varying temps.
 

jfk69

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 27, 2023
Messages
219
I’d go with 565, second choice 4831. Unless you have it, 7828 is unobtanium anywhere. There might be other choices worth investigating too. Ramshot Grand, 560 and H1000 come immediately to mind if you have them. On hand or can get them.
 
OP
jjohnsonElknewbie
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
3,690
Location
Western Iowa
I'm assuming these are powders you have on hand?? But if not have you run the numbers with RL23?
I don't have any of these in stock, I wanted to finish my research first. I have some H1000 on hand and thought it may be a possibility, but it's too slow. 102%+ fill to get close to these powders in terms of velocity.

I ran with RE-23, and at a 65 grain max, the case fill is only 95.8% with 3118 MV. Slightly slower than H4831, but could be a contender.
 
OP
jjohnsonElknewbie
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
3,690
Location
Western Iowa
I’d go with 565, second choice 4831. Unless you have it, 7828 is unobtanium anywhere. There might be other choices worth investigating too. Ramshot Grand, 560 and H1000 come immediately to mind if you have them. On hand or can get them.
Ramshot Grand isn't in the Gordon's powder database unfortunately, but according to the burn rate chart, it's slower than H1000. N560 is very close the N565, but is faster burning with a 68 grain max and 96% fill rate for 3152 MV.

I also looked at Retumbo, and it's slower thatn Grand or H1000.

RE25 should be right on burn rate, but it's not in the Gordon's database.
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,694
I tend to avoid anything that is near 100% to avoid powder spilling out of the case neck while tapping to settle everything. I don’t mind compressed loads if needed, they are just more time consuming.
 

SloppyJ

WKR
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
1,852
I tend to avoid anything that is near 100% to avoid powder spilling out of the case neck while tapping to settle everything. I don’t mind compressed loads if needed, they are just more time consuming.

I believe that the 100% takes into account the bullet seated into the case so its not all the way to the neck. A way to check would be to adjust the OAL and see if the percentages changed.

Either way, some of the 223 loads I run with varget are pretty full. Put your thumb over the top and give it some love to settle it. If your wife has any vibratory uhhh... items, throw one of those on there! 😂 apparently a toothbrush works too but that's not as fun.
 
OP
jjohnsonElknewbie
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
3,690
Location
Western Iowa
I believe that the 100% takes into account the bullet seated into the case so its not all the way to the neck. A way to check would be to adjust the OAL and see if the percentages changed.
That's a good point, and I may just do that. 3.094 seats the 147 at the boattail/neck junction.

For mags I'm going to get a couple L mags and modify the feed lips for the fat case. A couple thousandths on both sides and they should load fine according to several other guys that have built them. This eliminates the COL constraint with the WSM mags.
 
OP
jjohnsonElknewbie
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
3,690
Location
Western Iowa
I've used H1000 in a 6.5 WSM with great results, don't be to quick to dismiss it.
Roger that, and I'd love to see your load data if you're willing to share. I'm using Norma 270 WSM brass and have Remington magnum primers on hand.

The Gordon's data is theoretical anyways, but the calibration shows very high for the Vhitavouri powders and less so for the H1000, so there could definitely be room for error.
 

Wrench

WKR
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
6,513
Location
WA
You're going to need to sight and season the barrel anyway.....I would absolutely push some h1000 through it.

While all good barrels hammer, they also have a favorite and 100fps isn't anything to cry about if it comes with accuracy.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2023
Messages
18
I'm a big fan of GRT and QL but neither fully profile powders correctly. Load all 3 up and check. What they label as 100% doesn't mean if you don't shake the case around the powder will settle. Also does the 100% mean slow pour or with drop tube? I let the rifle choose what it likes to spit out. Some of my best loads are 85% fill. Others are 108% case fill according to GRT and QL.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2022
Messages
1,406
I tend to avoid anything that is near 100% to avoid powder spilling out of the case neck while tapping to settle everything. I don’t mind compressed loads if needed, they are just more time consuming.

I am pretty sure that 100% case fill equates to the powder coming right up to the shoulder neck junction.
Drop tubes help considerably to eliminate the need for tapping as well. Just an FYI.
 

WKR

WKR
Joined
Jun 14, 2019
Messages
2,094
If you don't already have 7828 on hand, I'd take it off your list. Not because it's a bad powder, but because it's impossible to find.

Out of the remaining two, I'd try 565 first.
 

pender1

FNG
Joined
Jul 26, 2024
Messages
24
Ramshot Grand isn't in the Gordon's powder database unfortunately, but according to the burn rate chart, it's slower than H1000. N560 is very close the N565, but is faster burning with a 68 grain max and 96% fill rate for 3152 MV.

I also looked at Retumbo, and it's slower thatn Grand or H1000.

RE25 should be right on burn rate, but it's not in the Gordon's database.
There's an article about Grand in the latest Handloader Magazine. The writer claims it's functionally a replacement for Ramshot Magnum.

 
Top