But just wondering why the '06 isn't brought up as much for the classic all-arounder for big game? I know I had some difficulty over the past year or so getting brass for my son's '06, and have had one or two friends say they fear it might be becoming a dying round. Is that the consensus? If not, why not more love as a "generalist" hunting firearm?
Because it doesn’t do anything functionally different than nearly any other cartridge- while recoiling more, being more expensive, burning more powder, being less shootable, and generally having more wind drift and lower hit rates than smaller cartridges.
The “flexibility” commonly stated of using heavy bullets for elk/moose/etc, and a different lighter bullet for deer/antelope/etc. is silly- use one bullet for an everything.
There are not
vast differences in wounding (tissue damage) between any of the common shoulder fired cartridges. The joke of thinking that .084” difference in bullet diameter from a .224 to a .308, is going to make some massive difference in killing is as absolutely silly as the .084” difference suggests. There
are large differences in bullet construction that do show noticeable differences in all calibers from .224 on up.
I have shot a lot of 30-06 (almost 10k rounds a year for a couple of years alone), and a massive quantity of 308win. I have an affinity for both. However, as I’ve said before- what people had in their minds that the 308/30-06
was; is actually what the 6.5 CM
is.
Taken all into account: the 6.5 CM burns less powder, recoils significantly less, is less expensive, almost always more accurate, has world class factory ammo available everywhere, is more shootable, has less wind drift, and has a higher hit rate at all ranges than the 30-06. Given equal projectiles both are nearly indistinguishable from each other in tissue and killing.