Buying your first lightweight mountain rifle in 2025.

You won't regret that.

Have you had a chance to put hands on a 90 action yet? The term gets overused, but they really are smooth as glass -- and the trigger is phenomenal.

I haven’t really found it smoother than a good T3X (but some of those are notably better than others.) It’s a true short action though, so it’s maybe a bit quicker, theoretically. 10degrees less bolt lift as well.

The bolt is a bit undersized to the action, such that you can see the top cartridge in the magazine. So I guess there’s a greater pathway for debris and precipitation compared to the T3X. I’m sure someone around here will probably pack that full of snow and dump in a bottle of freezing water sometime, for comparison’s sake.

The trigger is good, but it’s not remarkably better than the Tikka trigger. At least to me. The trigger on Strasser rifles feels worlds better, imo. But Sako’s trigger certainly is easily adjustable, crisp, and the lock time is allegedly world class.

The safety blocks the firing pin. This is nice.

Rifle weighs 5oz less than comparable T3X Superlite. Real bottom metal and mag, too. And flush, for an improved carry.

The execution of the stock is tip top and really sets the rifle apart. There’s a lot of aftermarket stock options for other rifles, but if the ergos of the Peak stock work for you, you’d be hard pressed to find another built so well.
 
The Tikka superlite is tough to beat especially for the price.

It is, but the comb height sucks on Tikka stocks when used with optics. And the stock geometry/build isn’t the best for recoil. But a cheek riser and a flat recoil pad are cheap improvements that make them pretty usable, though I get why folks look aftermarket.

If Tikka just made some very minor changes to it’s stock design, they’d have a much more satisfactory product, imo.
 
If you're getting a rifle just for sheep and goat, no one makes a good factory one. They all weigh too much or are not offered in a cartridge appropriate for such a light rifle.
The Sako 90 peak, while I'm sure a fine rifle, for the price you can put together something better and lighter yourself.

Custom doesn't mean expensive. If you own a torque wrench you can "build" a rifle. Because you're not building anything. The machinist that made the action and barrel did all the work. Have them put those together and ship it to you.
I'll take a custom action, barrel and stock for less than the sako every day.
 
If you're getting a rifle just for sheep and goat, no one makes a good factory one. They all weigh too much or are not offered in a cartridge appropriate for such a light rifle.
The Sako 90 peak, while I'm sure a fine rifle, for the price you can put together something better and lighter yourself.

Custom doesn't mean expensive. If you own a torque wrench you can "build" a rifle. Because you're not building anything. The machinist that made the action and barrel did all the work. Have them put those together and ship it to you.
I'll take a custom action, barrel and stock for less than the sako every day.

I’d be interested in hearing exactly what you’d do.
 
It's sounding like many here aren't going with as much magnification that I had in mind for the scope. From those with experience hunting those goat and sheep on the mountain, is a 10x sufficient for the distances you have hunted them? I currently own a pair of 1-6x and 1-8x LPVO's.
 
It's sounding like many here aren't going with as much magnification that I had in mind for the scope. From those with experience hunting those goat and sheep on the mountain, is a 10x sufficient for the distances you have hunted them? I currently own a pair of 1-6x and 1-8x LPVO's.
Depends. How far can you ethically take a cold bore shot from a field position in the mountains? Say, 12" vitals.
10x takes you to 500y on a sheep sized target fine. Not many people can make cold bore 2.xMOA hits in the mountains with a mountain rifle at that distance.
So, it's likely 10x is plenty for you.
 
I’d be interested in hearing exactly what you’d do.
For 3k, which is what the mentioned sako 90 peak seems to be going for...

Peirce or pure Titanium action
Mcgowan or PBB pre-fit featherweight stainless
Echelon versa stock.

You'll be an ounce or so under 4lbs and right in that 3k ballpark as the sako with a MUCH better stock. You can also chamber it in something appropriate for such a light rifle. Like about any 224-243 cal.
 
What I did:

Tikka T3x Superlight (fluted) in 6.5CM
Chopped to 16” and threaded
Bastion Blacktooth stock bedded
High Desert Bottom metal
UM Tikka rings
Leupy Mk4 2-10ffp TMR
OMR titanium bolt handle w/carbon knob
Fluted bolt by Kemfeld
SiCo Scythe
5rd mag
Aadland scope covers
Spartan gunsmith adapter

7.5lbs as pictured. Very accurate and can shoot sub moa 10 shot groups. Will kill anything out to 650 yards. Love this rifle.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2975.jpeg
    IMG_2975.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 66
  • IMG_3032.jpeg
    IMG_3032.jpeg
    296.5 KB · Views: 64
Balling on a budget:
Ruger American Ranch Gen II in 6.5CM -6lb 5oz
Or
Ruger American Compact in 6.5CM - 6lb 2 oz
Leupold VX-3HD 4.5-14x40 - 13.3 oz
Leupold PRW2 1” low rings - 4.3 oz
 
For 3k, which is what the mentioned sako 90 peak seems to be going for...

Peirce or pure Titanium action
Mcgowan or PBB pre-fit featherweight stainless
Echelon versa stock.

You'll be an ounce or so under 4lbs and right in that 3k ballpark as the sako with a MUCH better stock. You can also chamber it in something appropriate for such a light rifle. Like about any 224-243 cal.

Thanks! I now recall that I read some of your posts recommending the Echelon. It was/is definitely something I’d love to know more about. I like how the inlet surfaces are “molded carbon fiber, not fillers”, but the build process isn’t clear. Whereas the Sako RTM method is quite transparently demonstrated online, and extremely good. Maybe Echelon’s process is more similar than not? That’d be quite a jump in production technologies from what was reported in the initial Rokslide review by Torin Miller; but it was mentioned that was changing. It’d be awesome to know what they are doing.

I love Echelon’s transparency with stock specs, whereas some of the popular stock recommendations lack basic data like drop measurements. I certainly like some of those numbers.

Is it really a “MUCH” better stock than the Sako Peak? I think it’s bold, but I’d love to pull at that thread.
 
I normally hunt in mountainous areas, between 1,000 and 2,600 meters above sea level. I engage in long walks through dense vegetation and rugged terrain with steep slopes.
And the rifle I use most is a Tikka T3X Lite 6.5cm, 147g, 2850ft scope with a 4-18x44. The whole thing weighs 4 kg. I've now swapped the scope for a 2-12x24 Discovery, reducing the weight a bit further.
And it's perfect up to 500 meters.
 
Tikka 6.5 Creed Superlite, NXS 2.5-10x42, UM rings and a case of ammo (143 or 147 Hornady) will get you there faster than you can say "sheep down".

Can also be put together and shooting steel at 600ish in about an hour.

Dave
Those new super lite roughtechs with the threaded 20” barrel really seem like the solution to 98% of people who want a new hunting rifle…
 
Back
Top