Absolutely. I've killed elk with my 30-06 just as dead as my hunting buddies who shoot 300 win mag and 300 ultra mag. ((not saying the 30-06 can hang with those rounds at all distances, but at 400y which is my elk range, a good shot from any of those will kill them just the same))Tell him to focus more on shot placement. Bc that’s honestly what kills
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree with most of the post but, there is a palpable difference in monolithic performance in this cartridge especially over cup and core. I don’t know much about the Fusion but if it’s bonded it should do a good job. I’d bet on a Barnes 150 or 165 TTSX to outpenetrate it every time though.Monolithics like a TTSX also work at that weight because the velocities are high enough for reliable expansion, but they're about 2x the cost of the Fusions for terminal ballistics you'd doubtfully see any difference in.
There's some cartridges and situations the expensive "premium" elk bullets makes sense. In the case of the 308 win, all they really do is stroke ones ego that needs to say how much they spent on their elk hunt and that they had all the "best" stuff.
Whatever you need to tell yourself, go for it. It's your money, your ego, and it really doesn't matter to me. But that statement is enough mental flatulence for me to ever take your opinion seriously.But bonded and monolithic are notably better at everything. It’s not ego stroking, they are just better.
Lol, speaking of egos. I think your panties are all bunched up there, you should sort that out when you finish your tantrumWhatever you need to tell yourself, go for it. It's your money, your ego, and it really doesn't matter to me. But that statement is enough mental flatulence for me to ever take your opinion seriously.
This is the first season I killed an animal with a copper bullet. It was a .270 130gr bullet that came out at about 3100fps. It went through the elk at 220 yards and dropped it. However I wasn't at all impressed with the wound channel. I can't help but think the outcome could have been different if it had been a longer shot that was not placed perfectly. I am going up to 150gr bonded core for the .270. If I was using a .308 I would go with 180 gr bonded core. IMO range isn't as important as energy transfer for elk.Great responses. 150g Fusion would not be my 1st choice. But it'll do with no problems.
I'll reiterate what others have said, unless you are shooting something woefully inadequate, I think confidence in a round you have experience with will offset any advantage you get from moving to a "better" bullet.
I shoot Sierra GameKing tipped 165g, and sometimes Nosler etip 100% copper 167g. But if I had a box of 150g Fusion, I'd not hesitate to take them into the field too.
So, long story short, since time is probably an issue right now, I'd stick with the 150g Fusion since it's a round you know well. If I had time to work up a load and shoot 50+ rounds at a range, I'd look for something along the lines of a tipped accubond in 165 or so and shoot until I was confident in that round too.
I'm not interested in what elk you've seen die on your TV screen. There's plenty enough actual hunters on here that have used, Game Kings, Hot Cores, Interlocks... on game at moderate velocities to know you're blowing smoke. You're views don't affect my panties in anyway, they're riding fine and are still silky smooth against my skin. If you don't like people pointing out when you make a dumb statement, perhaps consider not making them.I’ve seen a lot of elk die from a bunch of different bullets. The difference in performance, to anyone who knows what they’re seeing, is clear as a goddam bell. Doesn’t mean elk are invincible or anything, or that you have to change what you are doing, or that everyone understands the difference, or that everyone who does know the difference is willing to pay a little extra for what they would gain