sndmn11
"DADDY"
Dude was only getting paid $66k to be an executive at BRCC... WOWIE
I was speaking more of the locker room banter...Being from WV finding blow up sheep in the cab of my work truck was always funny...
Looks like it was made public last September. This video is from October.Something seems off here. Even if it was filed in Sept of 2022 (I don't see any evidence of that, apart from the top of the laWow.org website), lots of time has passed since the events alleged in the complaint - which also says all harassment claims are being pursued via the EEOC, and I'm pretty sure that process doesn't take 5+ years. And it seems that this "news" has just been made public in the last few days - all at once.
Not sure if or to the extent this is true, but I found this article - https://coffeeordie.com/uvalde-school-shooting-solutions. The article says (among other things of interest) that the lawsuit was settled in 2019. The quotes thereafter seem a bit contrary to the complaint. Yes, the article discloses that the periodical/website is owned by BRCC.
One of the things I took away from their podcast, back when I listened before the Rittenhouse debacle, was that they expected new hires to basically buy into the company with a sweat equity kind of mentality. "We the current executives invested our money and time into the company and now you have to also" kind of thing. Not sure if that is the case here, but they mentioned the concept quite often. Hazing is pretty common and the story reads really bad for BRCC, hard to say where the truth is, but I personally don't trust Evan Hafer and BRCC as far as I could throw them.Dude was only getting paid $66k to be an executive at BRCC... WOWIE
You guess is as good as mine..The company name alone probably triggers at least 45% of woke snowflakes to run to their safe space, so there is that.Looks like it was made public last September. This video is from October.
Kind of odd that some online publications have now dredged it back up. Something’s going on, but what?
BRCC is marketed towards patriotic Americans who own firearms for self defense. Then someone uses a firearm in self defense (not just my opinion, but the opinion of the courts involved), wears their t-shirt, and they disown him and anyone like him because it's bad for the brand/PR.
I guess "Black Rifle Coffee" sounds better than "Controlled Opposition Coffee".
Now I'm not saying they made the right decision, just that there was more to that story. Frankly, as soon as another company comes along that makes good coffee and actually supports the culture they proclaim to represent I'm jumping ship due to the Rittenhouse and other issues.
didn't know Mormons are called mt Jews now.. never heard that one
Grew up in heavily dominated LDS areas and am no longer active and I have never heard that one either.+1 I’ve had one hell of a lot of LDS friends and a whole passel of family who converted…that’s a new one on me…
Way to cheap to buy the BRCC, every once in a while we have had people drop it off at the station and it’s good, but not 15 bucks a bag goodglad I’m a Folgers guy
Long story short...I’ve been a long time subscriber to their coffee and products how have I missed all the details about them ? Is there anywhere someone can link to what happened with them and the Rittenhouse case.
Way to cheap to buy the BRCC, every once in a while we have had people drop it off at the station and it’s good, but not 15 bucks a bag good
Like many things these days, I'm not sure you can find an objective source of info on this topic.I’ve been a long time subscriber to their coffee and products how have I missed all the details about them ? Is there anywhere someone can link to what happened with them and the Rittenhouse case.
Dude was only getting paid $66k to be an executive at BRCC... WOWIE
the perks..