Thehillbillee
FNG
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2024
- Messages
- 57
Yeah, you’re probably right about letting the process play out, letting twin metals make their case to mine the minerals safely and trust the regulators to give that a thorough review. That’s how it should work anyway. I hope it will now that the moratorium is lifted.Well it’s about ROI some one thinks it’s worthy of their effort . Why not let the EORs and preventive mitigation and remediation plans be drawn up and then we properly analyze the pros and cons . Are these not the facts you are asking for ?
Yes we need mines and by the hundreds to survive . Please regal me how you participate in this forum without being a benefactor of all the modern conveniences that these gross polluters offer you
But doesn’t seem like that’s what usually happens. Seems like the ultimate decision will be influenced more heavily by money and what’s politically expedient (and I’m talking about both sides). Does it ever really come down to the science? Are these companies ever really held responsible for their environmental damages?
As to your point about my hypocrisy, I know I rely on these minerals and that they have to be mined, but that doesn’t mean I need to support mining them everywhere or using any means necessary. I also rely on money, but I don’t get that money anywhere I’m able to or by any means necessary. There are right ways to get it and wrong ways. I work for it. Similarly I’m not convinced the twin metals mine is the right way to get these minerals.
Most of your assumptions about me also appear to be wildly inaccurate. I’ve never been to a bha pint night or even had a bha yuppie (nothing against them they just aren’t really a thing in my area). I usually drink Coors regular or plain old Jim beam.
You seem to be in favor of mining anywhere, anytime, and using any means necessary. I’m looking for more objective and nuanced opinions.