Meat eater did a podcast on cwd recently. Like other such conversations they talk of CWD effects on deer and possible effects on humans, but leave out the conversation of transmission paths, and preventing such transmission paths.
We are left with lots of speculation on meat mixing at butchers, spread from handling, what deactivates prions, ect…
One thing that sticks out to me is that they seem to detect CWD any time they start testing for CWD anywhere they test.
Have they done significant testing of isolated populations to see what they find? Like testing sitka blacktail on an island in SE Alaska or Kodiak, or maybe caribou on Adak island, or elk on Etolin island, (both planted populations), ect…
I wonder what would happen if hunters did a blind test of scientists by submitting samples from those isolated places, but not disclosing the harvest location?
Another thing that sticks out to me. The tests dont indicate an infection free animal. They indicate no detection in the sample tested.
The dog test seemed interesting, but the article didnt describe how infected the CWD positive elk was, or other details of the other fecal samples used for testing. I suppose its possible the dogs were 100% correct and the humans were 80% wrong.