BDC vs Dialing for new hunter.

[J.C.S]

If you could go back and start over which would you go with? Should I learn to dial from the start?

I got the fever this year after going hunting this whitetail season. I just used an AR with a 1-6 lpvo.

Now I want a proper setup. I bought a Ruger American Gen 2 in 6.5 creedmoor but scopes are overwhelming. I would appreciate some guidance. I like simple but also believe in buy once cry once. I’d like to spend $600 or less but I’ll go more if it means less regrets.

I’d say most of my shots are 200 yds or less. Can’t imagine one being over 400.

I got a vortex viper hd 3-15 BDC on the cheap but I’m wondering if I should return it and go with something I can dial. But again I’m all new and don’t know anything.

I’ve read enough of the forum to prepare myself that the answer is the maven 1.2 lol

 

[WyoBC_99]

ohman If you can't imagine shooting past 400 anyway set up that viper and go. Figure out your maximum point blank range and set that up for the primary crosshair and then you can work up to using the BDC holdovers.

 

[ScreamingPotato]

I tried to like dialing and just don't care for it. A reticle with MOA hash marks does everything I need without monkeying with turrets. Most will tell you MOA is gay and if you're just starting out MIL is probably better but my brain works with MOA so that's what I use. 400 yards you don't need to dial anyway. I would however recommend a higher quality scope, see what you can get from Trijicon for example. edit: We have some BDC scopes as well and they work fine as long as you get used to them and the subtensions, shoot to verify where you're hitting.

 

[hereinaz]

You can use hold overs out to 400

 

[RWT]

Agree with statements above. I used holdover and BDC style retitles for 30’years of hunting. I am very comfortable to 400 using this method. That being said. Once I wanted to shoot further and at smaller targets I realized dialing is more accurate of a method.

At this point in your journey go holdover with a marked reticle. Mil or moa. Doesn’t matter. But MIL will be easier if you want to go last 400 and start dialing.

A suggestion that I took to heart was actually figuring out exactly what distance the hash marks on the reticle corresponds with that rifle and the ammo. I did this and would walk my shots in on clay pigeons. I found that the hash marks were close but varied enough from published/assumed data that the difference would cause a miss. Then I made a dope card that was taped on that rifle. When you do have the distance figured out. Don’t consider it factual until you hit 4 out of 4. (Or however many your rifle holds) clays.

 

[J.C.S]

Agree with statements above. I used holdover and BDC style retitles for 30’years of hunting. I am very comfortable to 400 using this method. That being said. Once I wanted to shoot further and at smaller targets I realized dialing is more accurate of a method.

At this point in your journey go holdover with a marked reticle. Mil or moa. Doesn’t matter. But MIL will be easier if you want to go last 400 and start dialing.

A suggestion that I took to heart was actually figuring out exactly what distance the hash marks on the reticle corresponds with that rifle and the ammo. I did this and would walk my shots in on clay pigeons. I found that the hash marks were close but varied enough from published/assumed data that the difference would cause a miss. Then I made a dope card that was taped on that rifle. When you do have the distance figured out. Don’t consider it factual until you hit 4 out of 4. (Or however many your rifle holds) clays.

Thank you. Could you give an example of what you mean by a marked reticle?