- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,148
And, suppressed for all 221 rounds…. Without cleaning. It’s magic.
“Snip”
@Formidilosus
It’s a race to see who blows up first.
Oh no doubt. I don’t know what’s going to go first, the 308 barrel I am currently using that has about 10,200 rounds on it without cleaning (more than 2k just since the scope evals started), or maybe one of the suppressors with 20 thousand plus rounds on it…. ‘tis a mystery.
Sweet, that's a lot of rounds.
Rabbit trail: Have you seen barrels speed up compared to day one? I never kept the records to know on my limited samples.
I'm going to blast some more tomorrow- testing some minutia that will make your eyes roll. Curious to see if I find some extra speed after.Usually they speed up a bit until somewhere between 80-200 rounds or so. For the most part I don’t even take them serious until they have about 200 rounds on them.
I'm going to blast some more tomorrow- testing some minutia that will make your eyes roll. Curious to see if I find some extra speed after.
Well. I don't put a ton of stock in my labradar's accuracy, but my compressed loads of varget seem to get smaller SD and ES values than my recent non-compressed loads in the new barrel. The extended throat on my new 223 barrel allows me to pack as much Varget in the case as I'm comfortable with based on CCI400 and Fed 205M primers' appearance after firing. Those loads are not compressed. Labradar had higher SD/ES values than I'm used to. Want to test compressed charges vs. not. Untested variable I'm throwing in the soup here is a new seating depth, but I've yet to see it matter with 77TMKs.Haha. Do tell.
snip
Didn't see much differenceLet me know how it goes.
Didn't see much difference
Worth a shot.