Banning Hunting Tech in Idaho

I know a guy with a therm who agrees with you and supports this restriction during hunting season. His experience says "they're too effective"
Couldn't agree more for deer / elk and the like. I have a thermal scope that I use for coyotes / racoons, on a night with ideal conditions I have actually walked right up to a feeding deer on a moonless night and I was debating if I was going to touch it or not just to say that I did. It finally figured it out when I was <6 feet away
 
80% of how our 8yo gets to share the outdoors with us is through trail cams and scouting. It's safe for him to tag along in August from a weather standpoint, and there's nobody out for his singing or buffonary to annoy. The past two seasons we have left cameras out all fall into the spring and it has been fun to see what we capture.

It's also shocking that we have only captured 2 other hunters but lots of animals.

Thermals for recovering game.jist like tracking dogs I can get behind.

Using a cell cam in season to help your hunt I cannot support, but don't have a problem with non-cellular.

I'd LOVELOVELOVE to get a drone above my dog when we are hunting birds to record our hunts, but not use at that moment. It would be fun to replay it and see how roosters run.

I'd also be down for an open sights centerfire and traditional bow season here in Colorado.
 
Everyone has there limit,
garmins new range finder and its capabilities is to far for me.
OnX is awesome but some of the features is borderline.
All the people complaining about all the hunter in the woods and all this contributes.
If maps,compasses,no side by sides had to be fallowed that would eliminate a bunch of people right there.
No way drones should be used.
I don’t even think they should for downed game.
Work for it
 
I see thermal drones doing herd counts across the Midwest, that's though tree coverage.

Not all thermal optics are equal and the advancements are making them better everyday. Also as technology increases the older stuff just gets cheaper and cheaper.



Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
I was talking about hand held stuff - hard to see thru trees.

Totally get the drones - they can see thru the tree tops pretty easy.

Lots of guys carry thermal for finding hit/dead animals. Just seems pricey to me.

I have a cell cam. It mostly tells me when i shoulda been there. Also use it for camp security.
 
Great podcast. Thanks for putting it together.

I think thermals should be banned BUT I think the law would be very hard to enforce. When a rule is tough to enforce, it only hurts the honest people that probably already thought the technology was too far anyway.
 
My buddy talked to one of the reps that is on the legislative committee going through the rule change right now and according to him it won’t leave the floor. Says there are a lot of lobbyists in their ear that are against it. So if you support banning this stuff you need to reach out and show your support.
 
Good podcast. Kinda simple, but laying out how increased success rates can easily lead to shorter seasons and less opportunity was the nail in the coffin for me. The semantics of what tech is too much or too little will be argued for years regardless of outcome. As an Idaho resident not going hunting, having shorter seasons, or more limited/capped zones is not something I’m interested in. We’ll all use whatever tech is legal right up to the limit to increase lethality, I can live with some rules that are enforced.
 
There's some guys in the Baltics that have a youtube channel covering thermal drones hunting people. In relation to a war nearby. They are stupidly effective. If a human is that completely screwed, animals have no chance at all.
 
Back
Top