- Thread Starter
- #41
MT-nuffgun
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2023
- Messages
- 179
This is more my style, MPBR shooting is what I was raised on. We would shoot for a 200 yard zero and basically hold 6” above poi at 300 yards, if it was over 300 we would get closer. The shooting/hunting world has come a long way and I see the benefit of of hash marks and dialing but it is always comical watching some of these hunting videos on YouTube. I watched a video last year of 2 guys hunting together. They had a black bear at 250 and steadily walking closer, the shooter kept asking for ranges from his buddy and constantly dialing his scope, every time the bear would offer a shot the shooter was busy dialing, he finally catches a break at like 150 yards and shoots over the bear. The way my “simple “ rifle is set up, my eye never would have been out of the scope once I knew that bear was inside 250 yards upon initial ranging. Now all that being said, my next rifle will have a Swfa scope on it and It will have dialing capabilities, but I’m guessing most of my shots at game will still be inside of 300 yards.I don't have much shooting experience, but understand & endorse most of the advice & comments above, except for the more vague comments about poor shooting form that don't include specific details regarding the poor form. I just don't know enough to look at him and determine what all is the poor form I guess.
My question is this however, for the average/below average experience shooter (like me) looking to shoot for hunting accuracy, why wouldn't you zero your rifle at 250 yds? I assume this guy's rifle was zeroed at 100, because I thought there was mention of misses due to improper elevation adjustment for targets over 100 yds?
With a 250 yd zero, a quick ballistics calculator on a 300 win mag 195 gr eldm for "accuracy of water jug" shows no need for elevation or wind compensation with 90 deg 5 mph cross winds out to about 325 yds it seems. So, even with somewhat rushed shots under 325 yds, there is nothing to think about, adjust, or screw up.
I am fairly certain that I would really suck with that 300 win mag, especially after a few shots.
But am I wrong that with a 250 yd zero, reasonable winds, a decent scanning range finder, a dialed in reliable ffp scope with known reticle graduations (Jason mentioned above falling back on these as needed), a stable shooting rest, and a soft recoiling lower caliber rifle setup, shouldn't even a relatively inexperienced guy be able to be pretty deadly out to several hundred yards in these conditions?
Last edited: