sndmn11
"DADDY"
4-14x44 with parallax in the 24-26oz range in the shv price point.
3-12 bushnells...
4-14x44 with parallax in the 24-26oz range in the shv price point.
Let’s have @Ryan Avery set a range up. You show up with any rifle you want that’s 10’ish plus pounds, your current TT and two more, zero them yourself and drop it from any spot and height/angle you want 10x. Then I will buy 3x NF from the local store with you standing there, mount on a rifle, and do the exact same thing you do with the TT. If the TT’s holds zero for those impacts and the NF’s don’t, I’ll pay for your trip, and buy you a new TT. If the NF holds zero, then it’s on you and you come back and say so.
I’m in!
You guys don’t live very far apart.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sell tickets. And stickers.I’m in!
You guys don’t live very far apart.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I’ll check them out! Thanks!Trijicon accupoints seem to have a reputation as being tough for a small light scope however I have no experience with them
The Credo 3-9 appears to be very similar. That one has more eye relief and a little more field of view but has electronic illumination and a battery for a 4oz penalty.I'm going with 3-9 Accupoints duplex dot with a Kenton Ind. custom turret. I'm copying StinkyCoyote from here on this but looks to be a solution.
I'll post results when it all gets done.
Those 3-9 are very light at only 13.4 oz. I really wish the same model in 2.5-12x42 didn’t come with a half pound penalty.I'm going with 3-9 Accupoints duplex dot with a Kenton Ind. custom turret. I'm copying StinkyCoyote from here on this but looks to be a solution.
I'll post results when it all gets done.
Not quite but better than most others, if I recall Form’s experiences correctly. Maybe he’ll comment on this.I know very little about Trijicon. Are they considered as bombproof as NF?
Just an fyi, when consumer reports does a sedan review they are only evaluating one of each finished sedans. It is not statistically significant in the view most here recognize. But, those are finished products that throughout the manufacturing and assembly process have numerous QC checks. Same with jd powers.Agree completely.
I’ve been on here long enough that I don’t think he’s random, but putting that aside, if there’s any reason I question my equipment and I move on, what’s the best way to choose something to trust?
Agree about reviews, but short of Consumer Reports doing a test, I’m not sure of the alternatives. And tests done by the manufacturer are no more dependable or trustworthy to me.
I struggle with scopes that don't have good clarity. Swarovski is great but not rugged enough, How do you compare trijicon optical quality?For a backcountry scope, I would want durable and reliable, thus the recommendations for NF and Trijicon…discounts are great but don’t do much good in the field when you have a failure.
My scope after a 100 yd tumble/slide down a steep scree slope in MT mountains (with two kills afterwards):
View attachment 458426
which reticle? and why are they offloading at that kinda discount?I just got the trijicon tenmile 3-18x50 from euro optic, it’s over a thousand dollars off the MSRP.
So far it’s a very impressive scope and it’s going to work really well for what I got it for. The illuminated reticle, capped windage, MIL adjustments and eye relief are all excellent. I doubt you could do much better when you take the sale price into account.
It’s a MIL reticle, actually pretty nice. I have no idea why they are selling them so cheap but I’m still happy with mine. I figure trijicon will stand behind their product so there’s no risk to try it.which reticle? and why are they offloading at that kinda discount?
I agree. I went with a Credo HX from EuroOptic and no regrets. I have or have had all the scopes you mentioned. Currently have:Get a trijicon from euro optic.