Back Suspensions and Belts

Aron Snyder

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
5,014
Location
The Wilderness
There's been a lot of talk about backpack suspensions as well as belt options lately. This is mostly due to the argument of what belt system actually works the best for each user. I normally would stay out of this, but I've had some funny emails forwarded to me that that are...well, a flat out lie when it comes to suspension systems.

Most of the PM's and emails I get are about the 3 piece belt/lumbar pad system when compared to other options.

To be honest, ANYONE saying that a 3 piece belt with a lumbar pad only works below 60lbs has no idea what they're talking about. I only say this because of the large amount of packs that my friends and I have tested throughout the years and that a 3 piece belt is the ONLY belt that keeps 100+ lbs off our shoulders and on our hips. If you add the few thousand people a year that Kifaru sells load hauling packs too, and the feedback we get from them, I can see pretty quickly that a 3 piece system works best for 90% of users.

Having said that, we do get an occasional user that needs a smaller lumbar pad to make the pack feel like a 1 piece belt. After looking through our records, less than 1% of Kifaru users needed a smaller lumbar pad last year. This was an easy fix, as we offer several thicknesses of lumbar pads, but the point is that most hunters need a lumbar pad.

As some of you may know, I have no ass whatsoever, and the reason I ended up using Kifaru (and working for them now), is because a Kifaru pack was the only pack that allowed me to carry 150lbs and keep the weight of my shoulders.

Here's why a 3 piece system/Kifaru's works best for many people

1) The hip belt from Kifaru will wrap around your hips and basically cup them. This gives you 2 very good points of contact to keep weight from sagging.

2) Since I have no ass to speak of, the Lumbar pad is needed to give me something that stops the weight from sagging down below my hips. If I didn't have a lumbar pad, common since would tell you that I WOULD HAVE NOTHING to keep the weight on my hips...... it would just slide down.

Again, this doesn't mean that the 3 piece lumbar system works for everyone, as everyone is built differently, but it does work well for the majority of users.

Steve Speck has recently done A lot of teting with belts to come out with his Exo pack and his testing has shown the same as ours; a hip belt that cups the hips, along with a lumbar pad is by far the best system for the majority of users.


In this photo Joe and I both have 130+ lb loads. We are built completely different, but the photo shows we are standing upright with the weight of out shoulders.


In this photo I have 7 days of gear and an entire deboned mule deer inside. My pack weight was excedding the 150 range, but I'm still able to stand upright with a functional suspension. When I've tried this with other belt and suspensions systems, I was carrying 90% of the eight on my shoulders.


Another photo of a 90-100 lb load with a completely different body type.





In the photos with the KU pack, I'm hauling out an entire mountain goat. I had about 70% of the weight on my hips and very little sag, so if someone is telling you that 60lbs is the max for this system....they're trying to sell you something:)

Like I mentioned before, this doesn't mean that a 3 piece/lumbar system works for everyone, but it does work for most. And when you compare that to the other options (even the newest on the market), they will not work as well with everyone.

I think Scott Reekers and Luke Moffat have both tried some of the other options, and while they both agree that they are good, I don't think either would say that they are better than a 3 piece system. Both of these guys, as well as myself and many others, pack out HEAVY loads and many of them each year.

Hopefully this post comes across as informational, as I'm just wanting to let everyone know that there's no "perfect" option for everyone. I would say that the majority of people would prefer what Kifaru, Stone Glacier and Exo are offering.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
2,804
Location
eatonvile, wa
the 3 piece belt is by far the best ive tried.. it doesnt make 130, 140lbs feel like nothing but it sure makes a difference when that belt stays UP, And, TIGHT.
at the risk of being called out, bandwagon, koolaid etc, honestly, i think kifaru needs a catchy name for their belts, theyre that good.
 

Rizzy

WKR
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
1,431
Location
Eagle, Idaho
Whats a good way to find out what size lumbar pad to use? How do i determine how much ass i have?
 

CritterGetter

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
185
Location
Indiana!!!
This has effectively blown my mind for today... I can't see how a guy can claim 3 piece belt would't work above 60#?

I have carried plenty of heavy loads with Kifaru and MR packs. With that being said, the Kifaru belt works significantly better for me than MR's did. The Kifaru belt has done the best job at holding tight and cupping around my hips while keeping the loads from slipping down my ass. I even have a decent ass, unlike poor Aron. It's a given that one particular item will not work for everyone, but this is nuts. The experiences I have had with a one piece belt were less than stellar. I could not keep it from slipping down my ass and feeling like all the weight was up on my shoulders after a bit.

Apparently Patrick and Dana are on to something with these "bogus" 3 piece belts? I guess they have been building and designing packs since before most of us were born...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
683
Notice no weight on my shoulders...I wasn't smiling when I sat on that rotted log, flipped backwards, and smacked myself in the face with my trekking pole...
 

stephen b

WKR
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
489
Location
Mckenzie Valley, Oregon
Pack suspensions and hip belts can be a very person choice and decision; and rightly so. We are all very different. I remember well what my first anatomy teacher said regarding differences in people. He said that when it comes to anatomy, remember variety and differences tends to be the rule, rather than the exception. He went on to say as a point of illustration- that to show an example of that; we even as individuals can differ very much from one side to the other. He said if you took 1/2 of a persons face and made the other side the same, and and then did the same for the other side- the two " people" would look different from one another then lets say identical twins. So we do have different body types obviously.

Kifaru IMO- (and many others) has the best hip belt in the industry. There is a lot that went into the design of it- and it plain works.

I had a fella that has a lot of experience with packs and now makes and sells gear tell me that in his opinion, the Kifaru belt is what makes a Kifaru what it is.

As far as 3 piece belts- they are the way to go for me. I needed one on the SG pack that I have. I like a 3 piece belt, but also prefer one with a non- slip material.

The only one piece belt that does work for me with a heavy load is a Barney's pack. But even that one works better for me when I attached an after market lumber pad to it.
 

dotman

WKR
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
8,200
Well my recommendation to all new buyers, only ask the pack reps their suggestions on which options will work best for your intended purpose. This isn't a knock to Aron or the other pack companies at all.

If you want to see what packs work and work well Google them, plenty of first hand reviews by either happy or unhappy owners.

A 1 piece belt sucks imo but again that is for my body type. For a pack company to say a 3 piece will not do well with heavy weight would personally make me move on and remove them from my list.
 
OP
Aron Snyder

Aron Snyder

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
5,014
Location
The Wilderness
I agree with you completely!

I know there's a few guys on Rokslide that do like a one piece belt over a 3 and I have no reason to doubt them. Rockchucker30 (owner of Paradox) is one of them. I'm sure the belt he designed works great for him and others, but the 3 piece lumbar pad works well too. My point about the original post was simple; claiming the lumbar pad/3 piece belt isn't a proven design is a crock.

Everyone is built different (as Stephen posted), and we have more backpack and gear choices than ever, so getting the right pack should not be an issue.

Well my recommendation to all new buyers, only ask the pack reps their suggestions on which options will work best for your intended purpose. This isn't a knock to Aron or the other pack companies at all.

If you want to see what packs work and work well Google them, plenty of first hand reviews by either happy or unhappy owners.

A 1 piece belt sucks imo but again that is for my body type. For a pack company to say a 3 piece will not do well with heavy weight would personally make me move on and remove them from my list.
 

Angie123

FNG
Joined
Aug 30, 2013
Messages
10
Location
Colorado
uma5a7ug.jpg


I have carried a few loads in this pack (and I know I can cut off the leg:) I just really wanted to carry this load with as much weight as I could. I had the back straps and water, a couple other misc. items. I figure 90 or more
lbs. And it is the first pack that has not slid down my hips. The belt is amazing in my opinion. Full wrap without a lot of over padding seems to stay on my body better. Regardless of the girly hips. When it was designed we made a special effort to tailor it. So that being said, it's just a bit different than the bulky belts people are used to seeing. I also like that I can adjust the pack to never sit on my shoulders. I have had spine surgery and I have weird nerve stuff in my neck, and pressure on my shoulders is brutal.
 

Kevin_t

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Dec 2, 2012
Messages
1,162
Location
Colorado
Pack fit is personal. Some designs work better for some than others. It has been my experience that most 3 piece belts suffer collapse at the junction where the lumbar pad meets the wings (almost said meat at this site :)) . This is apparent in a lot of photos and I have heard many people comment the same in various posts or emails. Yes, for some people it may not be an issue, but for others perhaps it is. That seems to be the reason some manufacturers have put stiffeners between that lumbar to wing junction to minimize that point of failure. In my opinion, the best stiffener is your body and all a belt needs to do is not interfere or cause pain. Anyone can take a belt (not a pack belt just a belt) and place it around your body in the correct position and not be able to pull it off their body. It is impossible, your body gets in the way. This is the Paradox belt. As Angie mentioned it is tailored differently so it is very hard to get it to move when it is moderately tight. If you have a belt that works great for you great. You found something that works and you should stick with it. However, it has been my experience working with field testers that this has worked very well on almost everyone.

Now, if we could get RockChucker30 to post his 156 Lb deer load out. If I recall, looking at that photo , it was a birds eye view in that junction where most 3 piece belts fail and there was no failure at that junction. Now, to correct a point, I designed the belt with Angie and our head seamstress, who has worked on packs for 30 + years. Nathan was very involved in the overall pack design, and honestly he wanted a lumbar pad. I said let me send you this belt, and I did , and he said it's the best belt I ever used. I'm sold. I sold Nathan on the belt.
 

RockChucker30

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
775
Location
Working
za2eda4e.jpg


That buck weighed 156 dressed. I didn't pack him by choice but by necessity of where the devil ran to after a one lung hit.

The pack performed really well at that weight. The belt didn't slip at all and didn't have to be over tightened.

I'll post some thoughts on general belt design later. Its Valentines Day and time with the wife comes first. 😉
 
OP
Aron Snyder

Aron Snyder

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
5,014
Location
The Wilderness
za2eda4e.jpg


That buck weighed 156 dressed. I didn't pack him by choice but by necessity of where the devil ran to after a one lung hit.

The pack performed really well at that weight. The belt didn't slip at all and didn't have to be over tightened.

I'll post some thoughts on general belt design later. Its Valentines Day and time with the wife comes first. 😉

Are you hunched over because of the pack? I can usually stand upright with 156 lbs with my duplex or bikini. It could be the angle of the photo?

Have you packed out other animals with the pack? Would be great to see photos!
 
Top