I’ve used both over the years and no question I’m a fan of the wraith over the ATN. Not that Atn is junk, they’re nice scopes (the NV not the thermal) while they work but they have so many problems with firmware. Walk into any night optics dealer and ask which they get more returns on and have problems with and it’ll be the ATN everytime. I also like that the wraith is shorter, but it is top heavy on a gun. I would suggest to get the lowest power scope you can if you’re scanning with it, and definitely upgrade the IR light it’s a game changer. Either one will do the job but definitely make sure you have a warranty wherever you buy from. Electronics can and will go bad eventually. If you want a thermal or can wait a little and save (it’s worth it trust me) the Pulsar Core RXQ30V is a great lower end thermal for around $2,000. Stay away from ATN on the thermals they’re sadly underwhelming
The digex is a premium scope but it comes at a premium price unfortunately. If I’d be spending that much I’d just pull the trigger on a thermal. The best advantages of thermal is being able to quickly scan a field and see if anything is coming in where as Night vision you need to slow down and look for eyes and movement. Also thermal you will be able to see through some light brush/ vegetation and trees where as night vision will bounce off the grass and doesn’t do as well in more hilly and tall grassy landscapes. That being said In flat open terrain or hunting let’s say hogs over corn a night vision can be great because it’s easier to ID the animal as you can see details you cant with a thermal. YouTube has some great videos comparing the two. If you want to buy a used scope Facebook has lots of predator hunting groups where people will sell used scopes for really good deals. I picked up a wraith with an upgraded ir light for $350 a few months ago for a backup gun on FBThanks for the reply! Have you seen the new Pulsar digex c50? It’s a NV scope from pulsar. What are some of the biggest advantages of going to thermal over NV?