freediver111
WKR
On a bit of a whim I picked up an XLR element 4.0 magnesium chassis for my tikka. I own another XLR element aluminum chassis and love it, which is why I went with this one for a hunting rig I built last year. I also wanted a folding stock as I just got my first can and plan to hunt with it this year which will make it more compact when strapped to the pack.
I use an Atlas CAL tall bipod with the standard two screw pic rail attachment. Has anyone noted a huge improvement if running the area 419 Arca plate adapter along the arca rail slots of the chassis versus just using a standard 2.5” pic rail attached to the chassis?
My other element chassis doesn’t have the arca rails so this new element mg stock is the only rifle I have that the arca plate would be used on. Is the $80 arca adapter for the atlas bipods going to be a huge improvement over the two screw pic rail, or just adds more weight to a hunting rig that’s already 9.5 lbs?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I use an Atlas CAL tall bipod with the standard two screw pic rail attachment. Has anyone noted a huge improvement if running the area 419 Arca plate adapter along the arca rail slots of the chassis versus just using a standard 2.5” pic rail attached to the chassis?
My other element chassis doesn’t have the arca rails so this new element mg stock is the only rifle I have that the arca plate would be used on. Is the $80 arca adapter for the atlas bipods going to be a huge improvement over the two screw pic rail, or just adds more weight to a hunting rig that’s already 9.5 lbs?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk