- Joined
- Jul 29, 2020
Optical comparison of
I used this resolution chart:
Scoring was done like so:
RESOLUTION
I have to admit this was hard to finish. All optics were so close to one another you would probably never notice in a hunting environment. Parallax and the eyepiece were adjusted several times on each scope to get every ounce of clarity. I have 20/20 vision or better
*The 0.1 element on the chart was accidentally cropped out when printing. Anything that could not quite resolve 0.2 was given a score of 0.1
EYEBOX
This was done at max magnification. At anything below 12x I would consider all the optics Excellent. The Tenmile was noticeably tighter than the ATACR and Maven. But any two optics ranked next to one another were very hard to tell apart
HOW "NICE" IS THE IMAGE?
I used chromatic aberration to rank this because it was the easiest feature to pick up with my eyes to compare. This was done at max mag. At anything below 9x, the image is very sharp and clear with no real optical deficiencies.
Other notes and background:
I had the LRHS2, Maven, and Tenmile on hand and needed to pick two, so I already had intentions of comparing them. The ATACR is owned by a friend, and MK5 by a brother - both within a few minutes drive. So I added those two to the mix out of curiosity. My history with each optic is:
- Nightforce ATACR 4-16x42
- Maven RS1.2 2.5-15x44
- Trijicon Tenmile 3-18x44
- Bushnell LRHS2 4.5-18x44
- Leupold MK5HD 3.6-18x44
I used this resolution chart:
Scoring was done like so:
RESOLUTION
I have to admit this was hard to finish. All optics were so close to one another you would probably never notice in a hunting environment. Parallax and the eyepiece were adjusted several times on each scope to get every ounce of clarity. I have 20/20 vision or better
*The 0.1 element on the chart was accidentally cropped out when printing. Anything that could not quite resolve 0.2 was given a score of 0.1
EYEBOX
This was done at max magnification. At anything below 12x I would consider all the optics Excellent. The Tenmile was noticeably tighter than the ATACR and Maven. But any two optics ranked next to one another were very hard to tell apart
HOW "NICE" IS THE IMAGE?
I used chromatic aberration to rank this because it was the easiest feature to pick up with my eyes to compare. This was done at max mag. At anything below 9x, the image is very sharp and clear with no real optical deficiencies.
Other notes and background:
I had the LRHS2, Maven, and Tenmile on hand and needed to pick two, so I already had intentions of comparing them. The ATACR is owned by a friend, and MK5 by a brother - both within a few minutes drive. So I added those two to the mix out of curiosity. My history with each optic is:
- ATACR I used to own the same model and hunted one season with it before selling
- MK5HD I used to own this exact scope and hunted one season before selling
- Tenmile I picked up last November and have not hunted with it. Few hundred rounds of target and competition shooting with it
- LRHS2 and Maven were recently acquired. ~20 rounds fired with the LRHS2 and 0 rounds with the Maven.
Last edited: