Pharmseller
WKR
True - the 7 mag with a 175 accubond was the gold standard for many years. Kills a lot of elk!
Do you mean Partition?
Nosler makes the AccuBond Long Range in 175 gr, but not the standard AccuBond.
P
True - the 7 mag with a 175 accubond was the gold standard for many years. Kills a lot of elk!
yup - partitionDo you mean Partition?
Nosler makes the AccuBond Long Range in 175 gr, but not the standard AccuBond.
P
I’m using a Ruger American Predator Gen 1 in 6 Creedmoor with the Hornady 108 gr. ELDM.Just looking for some input on Elk Rifle Calibers, the market is flooded with so many options it makes the head spin. I currently have a 7mm rem mag. It has been an alright gun but it has let me down almost as much as it has impressed me. I have killed a handful of elk with it over the last few years but I'm sure not impressed with its knockdown. I hunt with a savage rifle , Hornady precision hunter ammo, I do not reload... My step brother hunts with a 300 WSM and I've watched him drop 3 elk with it, every time it's a no question hit, it sure packs a lot more punch. The only thing that sucks about it is the spendy ammo and lack there of in factory ammo options, so its appeal is somewhat diminished. What's everyone hunting with and if you had to buy a new rifle what would it be? Elk calibers...
You make a good point after we assessed the scenario the next day my brother figured I was hitting dirt in between me and the elk there were lots of weeds in the way as well, 28 years hunting and still learning .I’m pretty sure you could be in a helicopter firing directly down and a 200 yard hold wouldn’t be off enough to miss an elk.
The main things that will drive a shot like that wide enough to miss are contacting a branch or dirt between you and the animal, or the elevation knob brushed against something and you’re a full turn or two off, but you would have seen that after the fact.
You may not have seen dirt or a branch in the scope, but when using a low bipod it’s not a mater of if, but when being so low to the ground gets you in trouble. I couldn’t take a shot on a 200 yard bear because of it, and another shot at a deer across a meadow. Because of that, 200 yard shots are now automatically taken from a sitting position, or even shooting over a pack usually provides more opportunities to get up higher. It’s better you learn the lesson on a spike up close so it’s obvious, rather than on the buck of a lifetime at distance.
If you didn’t recover the bull how do you know it didn’t “penetrate the shoulder at all”?I lost a huge bull elk with that bullet in my 7 rem mag. High shoulder hit. Bullet never penetrated the shoulder at all. 200 yards broadside hit and the bull dropped but got right back up and ran off without a limp. I'll never use the 154 sst superformance ever again. I've had great luck with the 160 accunond.
Here's a little more detail. After the bull got up, he trotted about 60-80 yards. I shot freehand once while he was moving and missed cleanly. Then he stopped, I shot again and the bullet shaved the long hair off his lower neck but I believe missed any flesh . I wished that shot could have been just 3 inches higher. Anyway, I could clearly see in my scope a blood spot around the size of a baseball on his shoulder and the blood was starting to run down his leg. That's why I think the bullet fragmented when it hit the shoulder. I let the bull bed down in the timber for about an hour, which probably helped the wound clot better. I bumped him out of his bed but couldn't get off a shot and then followed blood for about a half mile before the trail went dry.If you didn’t recover the bull how do you know it didn’t “penetrate the shoulder at all”?
Much less if it even hit the shoulder considering he ran off without a limp…
Here's a little more detail. After the bull got up, he trotted about 60-80 yards. I shot freehand once while he was moving and missed cleanly. Then he stopped, I shot again and the bullet shaved the long hair off his lower neck but I believe missed any flesh . I wished that shot could have been just 3 inches higher. Anyway, I could clearly see in my scope a blood spot around the size of a baseball on his shoulder and the blood was starting to run down his leg. That's why I think the bullet fragmented when it hit the shoulder. I let the bull bed down in the timber for about an hour, which probably helped the wound clot better. I bumped him out of his bed but couldn't get off a shot and then followed blood for about a half mile before the trail went dry.
It's was probably more like 220 yard shot at a "wounded" elk because it was trotting sideways broadside of me. When tracking the blood trail, I found a small pool of blood where he was standing when I shot. In that spot was the group of long mane or neck hair laying on the ground. I assumed it was from my bullet. I was aiming for the front shoulder area again. I believe at that point he was quartering away from me because he ran straight away about 10 yards after the shot and disappeared into the timber.So you’re telling us you took an offhand shot at a trotting elk at 280 yards?
And then you shot again and saw the bullet “shave the long hair” of his neck? Where were you aiming?
P
It's was probably more like 220 yard shot at a "wounded" elk because it was trotting sideways broadside of me. When tracking the blood trail, I found a small pool of blood where he was standing when I shot. In that spot was the group of long mane or neck hair laying on the ground. I assumed it was from my bullet. I was aiming for the front shoulder area again. I believe at that point he was quartering away from me because he ran straight away about 10 yards after the shot and disappeared into the timber.