Manufacturers quiver is the way to go. I’ve been intrigued to try the Mountain View products CQ-2 though
As the designer of the Mountain View quivers (pre Sirius buyout)- as well as the older Elite 1 and 2 pc that ran from 2014ish onward, I am partial to the adjustability yet solidness of them. I think you would be generally happy with the CQ-2. It has a ton of vertical adjustability at both the hood and gripper ends, and once its tightened into the desired position it stays put. It's also very light all things considered. As long as your bow riser's quiver receptacles match one of the supplied adapter shapes/ styles, you should be good to go. I set up mine to essentially be under the top limb and the arrows are maybe 1/4" from my rest body with the grippers just in front of the vanes. Arrows stay secure and there's minimal to no concern about undue vibration. Either Mountain View quiver is basically able to be positioned as tight as you want them without touching. I'd argue better than the OG in this game - tight spot. Speaking of which... I was a big fan of BG products for a long time, even when I worked for the Outdoor Group I used BG sights. I bought a Tight Spot 2 pc when they came out but promptly sold it. It sucked - plain and simple. I suspect things haven't improved over there either since BG was bought out.
If I could do it over, I would only change the hood design on the Mountain View to be a little more straight forward to replace the hood insert, as that's truly the only wear item in the system. It's a bit of a hybrid design (unless sirius has since changed it) with a strip of high density foam inlaid between the TPE hood insert and the hood itself. The foam acts to hold the tip of the FP or BH slightly while the TPE insert does the majority of the securing. It works fine for most mechanicals provided the broadhead tip extends beyond the tips or shoulders of the blades a decent bit. Fixed blades are no problem.
Quiver hood designs and methodologies of holding broadheads are a tricky thing to get right.... some hate foam, some are fine with it. Some shoot big fixed, some shoot mechanicals. Blade deployment style and size all factor into the design. From a manufacturer's standpoint, replacing a piece of high-density foam is cheap and easy and the end user can do it, so that's why most run foam inside. I was always fine with foam since I mostly shot fixed blades (we went straight foam at elite), but the majority do not, so we did the hybrid approach for the MV quivers. Also worth noting - the TPE hood insert at least ensures you won't "clack" a broadhead into the inside of the hood when you're trying to add or remove an arrow quietly.... minor yet intentional design details.
Bottom line...Designing a hood and holding method to satisfy all user preferences/ camps is near impossible, so your opinion may rightfully differ.
Hope that helps your decision....
