Who am I to say what is real “hunting” and what is not?
For example: One thing I can’t quite get on board with is “long range hunting,” as the term long range is usually understood these days. I used to think I was a competent long range shooter, because I had done a fair amount of shooting in the 600 yard neighborhood in military and police sniper schools. But when someone says “long range” these days, they seem to mean something around 1000 yards, if not further; 600 yards is not long range anymore. But who am I to say they’re not really “hunting?”
Likewise, if you’re setting in a tree with a crossbow, who am I to say you’re not hunting?
I like what used to be called “still hunting,” although I don’t hear that term used much anymore. To me this has always been ground hunting, moving slowly and quietly, with shots coming from point blank to about 300 yards. But not everyone will agree with me that this is somehow the pure way.
Wasn’t there some outrage on social media a few years ago over someone who made a spear kill? To my way of thinking, that’s about as hunting as hunting can get, yet it was controversial. The bambi crowd was outraged for obvious reasons, and some hunters thought it risked a less than quick kill and thus made the hunting community look bad.
This question will never be answered to the satisfaction of all.