CorbLand
WKR
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
- Messages
- 7,793
Yes.Are the pictures of the grinning cowboy scattered throughout the thread the guy in question?
Yes.Are the pictures of the grinning cowboy scattered throughout the thread the guy in question?
OK, now we are back on track.
Around here, first blood wouldn’t mean anything. The animal goes to the killing shot, or the meat is shared on a group drive. Antlers/skull/hide go to the killing shot or to the clubhouse.
“There was a lot of bullshit going on in that canyon that day,” as the meme way above hammered home, and also praise is deserved for the gentleman above who killed the nice buck nicked by a neophyte yet gave it to the kid.
I’ve been at this too long to argue stupid shit. HOWEVER: The kill shot is the kill shot and the course of things flows from that, in a right world.
I waive off on anything these two social media drama queens have to say.
I just wanted to put it out there how things work in my part of the REAL world.
One wudda kilt the other and finished the story offIf this was two fifty-year-old dudes no one would give a chit!
IMO @SIR_34:16, you’re in the lead. Nice work.
The part that gets me is that the girls shot was not lethal in his opinion so he felt like it wouldnt have died and that is why he followed the blood trail...but his shot hit the deer in the knee, which apparently is lethal...?
Overall, its a shitty situation and the truth probably lands in the middle. Makes you wonder how different the story would have been if it was an average 4 point.
I also dont understand taking pictures with an animal you didnt kill or were not with the party that did kill it.
He had no intention of buying a replica for them. He just wanted possession of the deer so he tried to appease them.The thing that makes the least sense to me is if he's willing to shell out his own cash money to get them a replica...why didn't he just do that for himself to begin with and let them have the deer, and continue to hunt for another?
Two bucks, one tag, no?