Any flintlock hunters around here?

OP
HighUintas
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
3,306
Very cool info. It brought up some questions though... mostly, how are they measuring gauge? Is it from the lands, or grooves? IIRC, isn't 28ga basically 54cal? Is that how they would have converted it?
Gauge is basically balls to the pound. So, a 28 gauge is 28 balls to the pound (a 250gr ball) which is somewhere around 0.550 ball and maybe used in a 56cal bore (0.560 land to land).

The measurements can sometimes be misleading if only measuring the muzzle because some muzzles were coned.

1000002117.jpg
 

2Stamp

WKR
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
350
Location
Wyoming
That gun just keeps getting cooler, thanks for sharing the info.

The point you made about parts suppliers being older family-run businesses is a big deal. All my muzzleloading experience was as a kid, then went to college, DC, a ton of work overseas, then back to the real world about 10 years ago to start a business, get married, etc. And finally got back into hunting, and wanted to pursue some muzzleloader muleys. Of course, I turn to Dixie Gun Works to find a kit gun...and find almost nothing but ghosts. When I was a kid it was like the Sears catalog, 20 or 30 kit rifles to choose from. Now there's virtually nothing out there. Good to see someone like Kibler has kept it alive.
Not directed at you (I'm guessing you already know), but for anyone else cruising this thread and may be interested and looking for parts/ kits:
Kibler's Longrifles
Jim Chambers Flintlocks
Track of the Wolf
Pecatonica River Longrifle supply
Muzzleloader Builders Supply

Parts kits can be a blessing or a curse. Some are really well build, others can be more hassle than a scratch build. I have a builder friend in ID that can generally make a from scratch quicker than a kit. Kibler and Chambers are probably a couple of the best ones out there. (Or at least were when I was into making longrifles 10 or so years ago.)
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
1,156
Location
Lyon County, NV
Not directed at you (I'm guessing you already know), but for anyone else cruising this thread and may be interested and looking for parts/ kits:
Kibler's Longrifles
Jim Chambers Flintlocks
Track of the Wolf
Pecatonica River Longrifle supply
Muzzleloader Builders Supply

Parts kits can be a blessing or a curse. Some are really well build, others can be more hassle than a scratch build. I have a builder friend in ID that can generally make a from scratch quicker than a kit. Kibler and Chambers are probably a couple of the best ones out there. (Or at least were when I was into making longrifles 10 or so years ago.)

That's great stuff actually, much appreciated. I was only aware of Kibler and Track of the Wolf, so those other sources were great to look at.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
1,156
Location
Lyon County, NV
Not directed at you (I'm guessing you already know), but for anyone else cruising this thread and may be interested and looking for parts/ kits:
Kibler's Longrifles
Jim Chambers Flintlocks
Track of the Wolf
Pecatonica River Longrifle supply
Muzzleloader Builders Supply

Parts kits can be a blessing or a curse. Some are really well build, others can be more hassle than a scratch build. I have a builder friend in ID that can generally make a from scratch quicker than a kit. Kibler and Chambers are probably a couple of the best ones out there. (Or at least were when I was into making longrifles 10 or so years ago.)

On this note - who would some of the better custom builders be these days? Any recommendations?
 

2Stamp

WKR
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
350
Location
Wyoming
On this note - who would some of the better custom builders be these days? Any recommendations?
I haven't stayed on top of it. Kevin Blevins comes to mind. Allen Martin. John Stanley (but I think he's retiring from building). I think Chuck Edwards is still building. The CLA has a list of builders on their site. When I was on there a lot, the Muzzleloading Forum had some really good builders also.
 
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
659
Location
Western, CO.
Here are a few others to add to the list:






 
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
659
Location
Western, CO.
Gauge was that ratio of how many balls to a pound of lead. You will read in many of the original journals from the rocky mountain/western fur trade period, the trappers would make references to rifles size by x amount of balls to the pound. When looking over the fur companies supply records you notice that they were shipping and sold lead and powder together in a ratio of 2 to 1, 2 lbs of lead to one pound of powder. Even the ledgers show that when a trapper purchased these items it was in the same ratio. The amount of powder to shoot that amount of lead? The theory is yes, maybe it seems to equate. Vol. 5 of The Rocky Mountain Fur Trade journal, Doyle Reid, AMM, wrote an article " Lock, Stock and Barrel: Arming the Far Western Mountaineers" where he put this theory to the test.

To add some more to the steel Henry, this is the copy of the original first order for them, note the details:

1737567711447.jpeg

The first were ordered in 1831 and described: "10 rifles, single trigger, same as Dickert Gill sample... brown bbls.; length 3' to 3' 2" steel mountings instead of brass, but of the same shape and dimensions as brass mounted rifles, maple stock chequered grip, handsome pattern steel mounting, Ball mould to fit the caliber exactly," and ten more, "bbl. 3'6", 28 ga.$14. and to have the very best locks of 5" plate."

Later specifications called for 3-foot, 4-inch; 3-foot, 6-inch; and 3-foot, 8-inch barrels, checkered wrists, 10 to 11 pounds weight, and the gauge was sometimes 32. Crooks wrote J. J. Henry that the rifles were "to be manufactured with great care." The company was willing to pay up to $17 per rifle if they had superior locks. In 1832 the company demanded that the steel-mounted rifles be "made better quality." On September 9, 1833, the AMF ordered "20 Rifles-s[ingle] trigger 38" brl., 28/lb. [28 gauge] 5-inch waterproof [pan] very superior quality maple, chequered grip, steel mountings of a handsome pattern. Wiper to unscrew in middle. 10-11 pounds."
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
1,156
Location
Lyon County, NV
Gauge was that ratio of how many balls to a pound of lead. You will read in many of the original journals from the rocky mountain/western fur trade period, the trappers would make references to rifles size by x amount of balls to the pound. When looking over the fur companies supply records you notice that they were shipping and sold lead and powder together in a ratio of 2 to 1, 2 lbs of lead to one pound of powder. Even the ledgers show that when a trapper purchased these items it was in the same ratio. The amount of powder to shoot that amount of lead? The theory is yes, maybe it seems to equate. Vol. 5 of The Rocky Mountain Fur Trade journal, Doyle Reid, AMM, wrote an article " Lock, Stock and Barrel: Arming the Far Western Mountaineers" where he put this theory to the test.

To add some more to the steel Henry, this is the copy of the original first order for them, note the details:

View attachment 827303

The first were ordered in 1831 and described: "10 rifles, single trigger, same as Dickert Gill sample... brown bbls.; length 3' to 3' 2" steel mountings instead of brass, but of the same shape and dimensions as brass mounted rifles, maple stock chequered grip, handsome pattern steel mounting, Ball mould to fit the caliber exactly," and ten more, "bbl. 3'6", 28 ga.$14. and to have the very best locks of 5" plate."

Later specifications called for 3-foot, 4-inch; 3-foot, 6-inch; and 3-foot, 8-inch barrels, checkered wrists, 10 to 11 pounds weight, and the gauge was sometimes 32. Crooks wrote J. J. Henry that the rifles were "to be manufactured with great care." The company was willing to pay up to $17 per rifle if they had superior locks. In 1832 the company demanded that the steel-mounted rifles be "made better quality." On September 9, 1833, the AMF ordered "20 Rifles-s[ingle] trigger 38" brl., 28/lb. [28 gauge] 5-inch waterproof [pan] very superior quality maple, chequered grip, steel mountings of a handsome pattern. Wiper to unscrew in middle. 10-11 pounds."


This is extremely interesting information, and it finally makes sense why they'd be using gauge as a measure with rifled arms - it helped with the logistics planning around bulk lead and powder. Much appreciated.
 

kapntx

FNG
Joined
Feb 5, 2025
Messages
10
If you are wanting to get into flintlocks and don't need the latest and greatest and most fancy, a good condition Thompson Center Renegade or Hawken will be more than adequate. They are readily available online at gun broker and you'll be in the $450 to $600 range on most flintlocks. Search the local gun shops and pawn shops as well and if you do, take a bore light!

I have several TCs and they're all great shooters. I think it is the most satisfying way to hunt and more so if you actually can tag a deer! My current favorite is a PA Hunter carbine I found last spring for a great price. Stupid accurate, easy to point, light and again, stupid accurate. Hope to take a deer or two with that this year.

Pics of the carbine and the first shots with it after it came home. Various loads of 60, 65 and 70 grains 3F with a .490 rounds ball and .015 patch; which I later settled on a .018 ticking patch and it's hole-on-hole if I can see straight :)
I have a T/C Hawken flintlock. The lock was fast and reliable but the cock (hammer) traveled so far over that the edge of the flint ended down in line with the flash hole. After a couple of shots the jet of flame out of the flash hole from the main charge would melt the edge of the flint to a nice rounded shape (not good for sparking). I don’t know if all T/C flintlocks are like that, but I had to change that one out to an L&R.
 
Top