Another Tech Clothing Company to enter the marketplace

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,597
Location
Durango CO
Looks like this company intends to enter the high end, technical, mountain hunting clothing market in 2021:


 
OP
P

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,597
Location
Durango CO
Best of luck to them. It’s a difficult road!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I can’t even fathom what it takes to get a company like this off the ground.

1. the R&D
2. The manufacturing, Likely with pretty good sized minimum orders of 8-10 pieces to launch
3. The marketing.

On the marketing front, I looked at their website, which isn’t fully launched yet, and I got some retargeting ads. Not that it doesn’t make sense, but that’s money pouring out of the faucet, for sure.
 

P Carter

WKR
Joined
Nov 4, 2016
Messages
686
Location
Idaho
And another:


My theory is that the technical hunting gear is grossly overpriced and the r&d, marketing, etc is really just cookie cutter and not cutting edge at all. I’m guessing that people see that folks will pay $200 for a pair of poly blend pants with a few added zippers, and $150 for a fleece, and the margins are huge so they want in.

If that’s the case, competition is good, the prices will eventually come down. It’s pretty comical, though, to see companies come in and immediately hype themselves using the same positioning and catch phrases. No, WE’RE the most innovative and technical gear for the TRUE mountain hunter, and we have a former special operations guy to throw out some free workouts to show you how hard core we are.
 

Salmon River Solutions

WKR
Rokslide Sponsor
Joined
Jul 5, 2018
Messages
1,182
Location
North Idaho
I can’t even fathom what it takes to get a company like this off the ground.

1. the R&D
2. The manufacturing, Likely with pretty good sized minimum orders of 8-10 pieces to launch
3. The marketing.

On the marketing front, I looked at their website, which isn’t fully launched yet, and I got some retargeting ads. Not that it doesn’t make sense, but that’s money pouring out of the faucet, for sure.


If you wanted to know all that info, Brian at gulch gear would probably share it with you.
 
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
3,930
Wow, going to be a lot of clothing blown off the mountain by all this competition.

In all seriousness this is good. Hunting clothing is grossly over priced hopefully the competition drives down prices. Or at least leads to more sales.
Or leads to actual innovation.
 

P Carter

WKR
Joined
Nov 4, 2016
Messages
686
Location
Idaho
I think people just throw together a grid fleece like the Sitka core heavyweight, slap some proprietary camo on there, call it $149 and hope for the best.
 
OP
P

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,597
Location
Durango CO
I do like that Verdict is sticking to solids exclusively. 2 hunting brands offering solids exclusively indicates growing demand. Go back in time 10 years and imagine the idea of launching a technical hunting clothing brand without camo.

On a side note, I wonder how all of these technical brands sporting proprietary camo patterns entering the marketplace have affected “old school” brands like Mossy Oak and Realtree and will those brands eventually figure out a way to get their XXXL hunters to shell out $1600 for “hunting clothes” as well. They surely have felt a pinch in the marketplace from Sitka and KUIU.
 

realunlucky

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
13,108
Location
Eastern Utah
I do like that Verdict is sticking to solids exclusively. 2 hunting brands offering solids exclusively indicates growing demand. Go back in time 10 years and imagine the idea of launching a technical hunting clothing brand without camo.

On a side note, I wonder how all of these technical brands sporting proprietary camo patterns entering the marketplace have affected “old school” brands like Mossy Oak and Realtree and will those brands eventually figure out a way to get their XXXL hunters to shell out $1600 for “hunting clothes” as well. They surely have felt a pinch in the marketplace from Sitka and KUIU.
Curious if your only making solids what gives you the moniker "hunting" clothing? Plenty of amazing technical clothing companies out there if your strictly after a solid color.

A camo pattern on technical clothing was stika's original distinguishing feature when they started out. People still want it and will pay double or more what a similar solid piece would be.





Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
OP
P

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,597
Location
Durango CO
Curious if your only making solids what gives you the moniker "hunting" clothing? Plenty of amazing technical clothing companies out there if your strictly after a solid color.

A camo pattern on technical clothing was stika's original distinguishing feature when they started out. People still want it and will pay double or more what a similar solid piece would be.





Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk

I imagine the fact that you market yourself as a hunting brand makes you a hunting brand. If I’m not mistaken, camo patters from Sitka and KUIU costs the same as their solid offerings.

I think a lot of the brands are moving more towards being “lifestyle” Brands as much as they are “hunting” specific brands. Think about it this way: Burton clothing is exclusively marketed to snowboarders and only snowboarders wear the brand. Skiers don’t wear Burton. That’s what is happening here: hunters buy clothes from hunting brands because hunting brands market to hunters.
 

SMOKYMTN

WKR
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
774
Location
Smoky Mountains, NC
I think people just throw together a grid fleece like the Sitka core heavyweight, slap some proprietary camo on there, call it $149 and hope for the best.

I agree. Difference is KUIU, First Lite and Sitka have been able to market their brand with high end fabric technology (Toray, Gore, 37.5) while other brands haven't been able to replicate, afford and/or market such yet. That's the innovation it takes to make it in this market otherwise you'll get flushed out rather quickly.
 
OP
P

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,597
Location
Durango CO
I agree. Difference is KUIU, First Lite and Sitka have been able to market their brand with high end fabric technology (Toray, Gore, 37.5) while other brands haven't been able to replicate, afford and/or market such yet. That's the innovation it takes to make it in this market otherwise you'll get flushed out rather quickly.

What’s the barrier of entry for Gore, Toray and similar? Is it a minimum volume order that a start up can’t afford? Manufacturing standards?
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Messages
537
Location
Wyoming
What’s the barrier of entry for Gore, Toray and similar? Is it a minimum volume order that a start up can’t afford? Manufacturing standards?

Probably all of these things. I have a friend who used to work for Ra’ab and if I recall correctly only certain factories are approved to work certain materials and laminates. Buying into that supply chain may be difficult. The Sitka/Gore connection is powerful.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
OP
P

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,597
Location
Durango CO
Probably all of these things. I have a friend who used to work for Ra’ab and if I recall correctly only certain factories are approved to work certain materials and laminates. Buying into that supply chain may be difficult. The Sitka/Gore connection is powerful.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I figured it was something like that. Probably impossible to book the factories that are approved to work on the materials without massive minimum orders. That being said, if Gore let just any manufacturer use their materials, it could negatively impact their reputation due to poor quality control.
 

SMOKYMTN

WKR
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
774
Location
Smoky Mountains, NC
What’s the barrier of entry for Gore, Toray and similar? Is it a minimum volume order that a start up can’t afford? Manufacturing standards?

I agree with @Whiskey_Fish, likely all of them. Gore is likely out of the question since they now own the entire Sitka brand, and I would venture to say that the other 2 likely have have some sort of non-compete protections in place.

I should clarify that what I wrote shouldn't in totality, be the idea that it takes one of these innovations to make it in this market because it doesn't. A startup just simply can't throw a similar price on a similar product, without it. IMO Kings did a really good job of entering the market with lower prices albeit lower quality than the big 3, but found a consumer demographic that needed a mid-tier, mid-priced product. They in turn were able to transition into a more performance based product.
 
OP
P

Poser

WKR
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
5,597
Location
Durango CO
I
29772d6fdd2ad4e601f3f5c2b1569913.jpg
 
Top