(Another) EXO K4 or Stone Glacier?

You can see where I bought the R3 side bags in the quoted post on page 2, I agree that it is a slick setup with those.

That said, I've yet to implement them and doubt I will. I nerd out on being minimalist and plan on stuffing everything I need for 8-9 days of high country mule deer hunting this September in my 3600. If anyone wants them I'm pretty sure I still have them and haven't used them.
 
You can see where I bought the R3 side bags in the quoted post on page 2, I agree that it is a slick setup with those.

That said, I've yet to implement them and doubt I will. I nerd out on being minimalist and plan on stuffing everything I need for 8-9 days of high country mule deer hunting this September in my 3600. If anyone wants them I'm pretty sure I still have them and haven't used them.
I might take em

Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk
 
Here's a question to the Teratorn guys!

I actually am really intrigued by this bag, and here's why I think it would fit my needs.
I think the bag is overkill for a September archery hunt, I wouldn't use close to most of it. However, if I tuck the wings, it basically becomes the K4 5000 minus the side pockets. But that is a downside I actually kind of hate? The whole purpose of the wings is easy access without yardsale-ing the whole pack. And then I wouldn't even have some sort of side pocket at all.

I've found some posts from other guys who take their K4 5000's and put the SG R3 bags on the side. This basically gives them a homemade Teratorn. I kind of feel like this is the best of both worlds.

Pros of this:
- With the R3 wings off, they still have built in side pockets for easy access, and with them on, they have the benefit of the wings.
- You also keep the stretch pocket on horseshoe of the 5000.
- You increase the bag capacity to 7100 cu in.

Cons of this:
- You lose the dedicated sleeping compartment,
- You lose the shock chord.
- The R3 bags are also only 750 cu in, 100 cu in less than the Teratorn bags.

Are there any other things I haven't thought of that you Teratorn guys think might make this a bad idea?

(P.S. I realize that at this point I am 100% over analyzing this and that either option will produce adequate results on the mountain and that the decision is mine alone. BUT THIS IS ROKSLIDE! The place to over analyze everything!)

Here's the links to the other posts:
I prefer to use the wings rather than fold them away because they work so well for frequently used items. The R3 bags will be similar, but the TT as a whole is just easier to access, organize, and adapt to whatever is needed. I have used a 5000 for years, and it's a great pack, and for most, it is the best choice, but if there is a need for a 7000ci pack, then the TT is a good option. Will the 5000 with the SG wings work? Yep, and if you already have a 5000, then buying the wings makes sense. For me, there are several design features I prefer in the TT over the 5000.
 
I prefer to use the wings rather than fold them away because they work so well for frequently used items. The R3 bags will be similar, but the TT as a whole is just easier to access, organize, and adapt to whatever is needed. I have used a 5000 for years, and it's a great pack, and for most, it is the best choice, but if there is a need for a 7000ci pack, then the TT is a good option. Will the 5000 with the SG wings work? Yep, and if you already have a 5000, then buying the wings makes sense. For me, there are several design features I prefer in the TT over the 5000.
What are the features you like more on the TT than the 5000?
 
What are the features you like more on the TT than the 5000?

Wings - easy access and can carry all kinds of gear in them. The inside pockets of the wings are a good place for a rifle buttstock to sit in when carrying a rifle strapped to your pack.
Separate main bag pockets - the lower one is also easy to access.
Strechy pockets - size and that I can access them with the pack on.
The shock cord in the lid is very handy.
The shock cord on the main bag can be handy for stuffing a shooting bag.
Dedicated trekking pole holders.
With the exact same gear loaded its sits lower, so it doesn't get hung up as much when I duck under stuff.
The ability to expand to carry more gear for special hunts or SAR callouts.
 
Back
Top