That’s a valid and fair point. But again, people aren’t calling for the removal of monuments and statues in National Parks and battlefields. What Emerges from the conversation is more of a question of, in the year 2021, is a city such as New Orleans really so defined by and loyal to the cause of the Confederacy that they need an 80 foot tall statue of Robert E. Lee, a man who never wanted statues of monuments to begin with, and Jefferson Davis, a historical lackey at best, in and near the city center as some type of mascot of ideals and inspiration. The very idea of “letting go and moving on” often is consummated with some kind of ritual, celebration or event. And that’s where your argument turns to one of sheer convenience because you are essentially saying, “if I have to give up on the idea of New Orleans having a 80 foot statue of Robert E Lee, then You have to give up on the idea of removing that same statue”, in which case you are calling that a compromise, but you are still getting what you want and there is a very real implication of power in that.
For historical context, New Orleans was surrendered to the Union exactly 1 year into the war. For 1 year of New Orleans history, Lee was the general and Davis was the president. Of all of the history, people, ideals, principles, & stories, confederate statues are what we will choose as our symbolic mascots of history and part of how we will represent the identity of our city to the rest of the world?
Sure, there is subtly, nuance and duality in Southern culture, but an 80 foot statue in the city center (or for that matter, a ROTC building named for a Confederate General) are hardly subtle, hardly nuanced. Duality might be argued up until a certain point in history, but seems we have moved well past that point.