RyanT26
WKR
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2020
- Messages
- 1,336
It’s illegal in Kansas, that said I may or may not have been both the child and later the father in a this Scenario. Allegedly!
I can’t believe anyone ever speeds. The damn sign says 55mph! Why do all the tards in jacked up trucks give me the finger for going 50?? Blowing by me going 62-63mph
don’t they know that 55mph is the maximum speed allowed by law and isn’t a suggestion?
Terrible thing to teach your kids that laws don’t apply. Every time they see you exceeding the speed limit you reinforce this notion.
This whole speeding analogy some of you are trying to pawn off is absolutely ridiculous in my opinion, those things are not even remotely on the same plane. There are degrees of breaking laws, speeding is on the absolute lowest tier, poaching is WAY up there and if you disagree with that statement just take a look at the legal and social consequences of breaking each law: going 10 MPH over the limit = small fine and nobody cares, poaching = thousands of dollars in fines, confiscation of hunting equipment, loss of hunting privileges and you become a social pariah (look for threads on Mr. Greentree on this very forum for evidence).
I think it is very cool that this is legal in Alaska and I would totally do it if I were a resident there because I'm teaching my children to follow game laws. For those of you that are knowingly teaching your children to break game laws you are putting all hunters in a bad position in my opinion. Anti-hunters think we are all poachers and indiscriminate killers already, and you are proving them right and perpetuating it into future generations of hunters.
So, other than being socially unacceptable and against the law...you didn't provide a single legitimate reason as to why a child should not be able to punch a parent's tag.
I'm not sayin there aren't legitimate reasons but simply saying it's the law doesn't fly with me.
The simple fact that this is legal in some states and not in others demonstrates the arbitrary nature of most laws and illustrates my point perfectly.
Well cool, if being against the law and socially unacceptable isn't good enough for you then by all means, break all the laws you want. Go hunt over bait in Montana, it's legal in other states. Go run whitetail with dogs wherever you want. You should probably shoot 20 does a year in every state because that's what they can do in Texas. It's all arbitrary!
Honestly...it's not. I have my own moral reasons for not doing everything you have listed. You talk different levels of breaking the law yet equate killing 20 does to letting your child pull the trigger on an animal you have dead to rights and have a tag for...
I guess that's why they have to write it down.
I'm taking your statement that because something is legal in one state it means it's arbitrary and doesn't need to be followed to it's logical conclusion. Every state gets to set their own laws based on what their F&G department determines is legally acceptable. If you just take it on yourself to decide which game laws you are going to follow and which you are not you are a poacher and you are teaching your children to be poachers.
If you are ok teaching your kids to poach that is very disappointing to me as someone who tries my hardest to portray hunting in a positive way. We have an uphill battle to keep our hunting rights and people who perpetuate these types of practices are the exact opposite of what we need as sportsman. I noticed that you ignored that original point completely.
If every hunter used his/her moral compass to drive their hunting and fishing decisions instead of game laws, we would have a very big problem on our hands. Teach your kids to follow the rules. If they don't agree with the rules, teach them how to change them.No, you're not but you get 10 points for your excellent virtue signaling. You're missing the point entirely. I don't find it morally objectionable to allow a child to pull a trigger on an animal that I have a tag for. That doesn't mean I'll let it happen but by and large, my moral compass drives my decisions and not arbitrary rules on paper. YMMV.
Like it or not, in this particular instance, this regulation is 100% arbitrary. This is obviously not the case with all regulations...I would think that should be common sense.
No, you're not but you get 10 points for your excellent virtue signaling. You're missing the point entirely. I don't find it morally objectionable to allow a child to pull a trigger on an animal that I have a tag for. That doesn't mean I'll let it happen but by and large, my moral compass drives my decisions and not arbitrary rules on paper. YMMV.
Like it or not, in this particular instance, this regulation is 100% arbitrary. This is obviously not the case with all regulations...I would think that should be common sense.
If every hunter used his/her moral compass to drive their hunting and fishing decisions instead of game laws, we would have a very big problem on our hands. Teach your kids to follow the rules. If they don't agree with the rules, teach them how to change them.
Please, oh wise one, enlighten me on which regulations are arbitrary? It clearly isn't based on what is legal in some states and what is legal in others, so what is the criteria that you use to determine what game laws you follow and which you don't? Is it your superior moral compass? Could you put your thoughts down on paper so that we can all benefit from your wisdom?
The path that you are on is absurd. No one cares what you think is arbitrary and what you think is morally correct. This is why we have laws. If you don't like the way the law is in your state, move to another state or petition your F&G department to change the laws! You have that freedom. You do not have the freedom to decide which laws you follow and which you don't. This is how society functions. I'm sorry that as a grown adult you haven't figured that out yet, but it's true. Like it or not the laws in this country are the laws in this country. You can choose to break them, you can choose to teach your children to break them, you might even get away with it, but you are living your life by lying and teaching your children to lie. Call it virtue signalling or whatever you want to call it, ,but you are the one advocating for teaching your children to lie and by my moral compass that is wrong.