I have A style aluminum poles and have considered "upgrading" to lightweight carbon. What is it about these that you don't like for heavy loads? Do they flex, break, etc?A, but aluminum. Lightweight trekking poles really have low utility for packing heavy packs over shitty terrain. I would have no problem using lightweight B-type poles for backpacking tho.
They break way more often than is acceptable.I have A style aluminum poles and have considered "upgrading" to lightweight carbon. What is it about these that you don't like for heavy loads? Do they flex, break, etc?
i dont trust shock cordI'm curious what others think the pros and cons are of each style, thanks.
View attachment 589889View attachment 589890
I am also curious about the numbers. Way more for option A than I expected.B.
I use the Z-style from Leki. I'm not sure why I would ever switch. I'm surprised by the poll results so far.
I have some B style and they have cable run through the middle, leki I think. No shock cordi dont trust shock cord
Not friction only. Once assembled there is a lock tab that pulls inner cord tight and holds them together.So style B goes together with friction only? If it gets planted in mud or catches between two rocks, it just comes apart? Hmmm…. It would have to be free and half the weight to make that compromise.