I'd vouch for the 6.5 StaBall velocity numbers so far based on my testing with it in 22" barrel 7-08 and after it was chopped to 18.5". Not apples to apples but just for comparisons sake.
Just dug up some 150 eld-x chrono data from last year, 22" barrel, 2825 fps at 60 deg. F.
After barrel chop to 18.5" same load was 2722 fps at 34 deg F.
With 162 SST (all I could find at the time) 22" barrel was aver. 2791 fps, and I never pushed it on pressure to find out what the limit was because I didn't see any sign of accuracy coming out of that combination.
In testing with the 162 ELD-M later, 18.5" barrel w/ can, it became apparent that my rifle does not like either the bullet or the powder or both from an accuracy perspective so I never ran up to pressure, but at about 50 deg F was seeing 2670 fps average. Probably not far away from pushing it as hard as I'd care to anyway, it's a 7-08 not an STW ha. Not too shabby though! Just wish my barrel liked the powder better.
Going to try the unobtanium 4451 and Varget next w/ 162 ELD-M.
Just dug up some 150 eld-x chrono data from last year, 22" barrel, 2825 fps at 60 deg. F.
After barrel chop to 18.5" same load was 2722 fps at 34 deg F.
With 162 SST (all I could find at the time) 22" barrel was aver. 2791 fps, and I never pushed it on pressure to find out what the limit was because I didn't see any sign of accuracy coming out of that combination.
In testing with the 162 ELD-M later, 18.5" barrel w/ can, it became apparent that my rifle does not like either the bullet or the powder or both from an accuracy perspective so I never ran up to pressure, but at about 50 deg F was seeing 2670 fps average. Probably not far away from pushing it as hard as I'd care to anyway, it's a 7-08 not an STW ha. Not too shabby though! Just wish my barrel liked the powder better.
Going to try the unobtanium 4451 and Varget next w/ 162 ELD-M.