Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree that that the gun and recoil must be taken into account for a youth hunter. Recoil is influenced by barrel length, powder and bullet size. Not sure that a 140-150 gr bullet will have more recoil than a 120 gr out of the same rifle. Depends on the powder charge, barrel length, brake/suppressor, and resulting velocity out of the barrel.So why increase recoil by upping bullet weight? Everyone shoots lower recoiling rifles better. Theres been some really good threads about kids rifles and calibers on here
Kids rifle manifesto
I've chimed in on so many different "what rifle for my age XX kid?" threads that I thought I'd try to consolidate my thoughts here. My oldest son is 14 now, started shooting centerfire rifles at 9. My younger kids started shooting centerfire rifles at between 5-7 yrs old. 5 kids shooting now...rokslide.com
that have really good information if you can have an open mind and not be stuck on the idea that elk are armor plated.
Some more here specifically on the 120 nbt
Help me decide next steps for my 13 year old
Ok, long advice post so be forewarned. @Formidilosus I would especially like your input on this. My 13, almost 14 year old son has a somewhat cobbled together setup, a 7mm-08 Ruger American compact with a SFP 2-10x Minox ZX5. I handload 120 Ballistic Tips for it. He shoots it well enough, but...rokslide.com
Not necessarily. Thin jackets sometimes splash at longer distances. With elk, you want penetration, which ballistic tips fail to provide.Wouldn't the thin jacket work better at longer ranges with your scenario?
Makes sense. I have, and would use 120 ttsx. At 3k fps, they have light recoil and will drop elk with no fuss, and very little meat waste.I don’t want to set her up for failure. In fact, I want to give her the best chance possible of being successful. That is why I started this thread asking for people to share their experiences and opinions so I can make the most informed decision on bullet selection.
Not necessarily. Thin jackets sometimes splash at longer distances. With elk, you want penetration, which ballistic tips fail to provide.
My buddy is stubborn and uses them on elk, and it almost always ends up a rodeo. He is an excellent shot BTW. Those bullets are very unpredictable on elk, not to mention bloodshot meat city, when everything goes smooth.
Blowing up inside the animal is much different than splashing, which is blowing up externally. Splashing causes an external wound due to the lack of penetration. The animal may or may not eventually die.Whats the difference between blowing up and splashing. In my simple head it seems its the same just different words
blowing up inside the animal is good blowing up on a shoulder blade not good which would be the same as splashing. So why at longer distance would a bullet splash at a lower impact velocity it seems your going against everything physics and ballistics would say.Blowing up inside the animal is much different than splashing, which is blowing up externally. Splashing causes an external wound due to the lack of penetration. The animal may or may not eventually die.
You should ask Nosler? My guess is the thin jacket combined with open tip expands enough to tear open at lower velocities.blowing up inside the animal is good blowing up on a shoulder blade not good which would be the same as splashing. So why at longer distance would a bullet splash at a lower impact velocity it seems your going against everything physics and ballistics would say.