7 prc braked vs 7 rem mag

Joined
Oct 19, 2025
Messages
18
This may be a very specific question but I'm in the market for a new rifle. I haven't shot a lot of high powered rifles, 308 and 7 rem mag... that's it. I'm considering getting the 7 PRC but I'm concerned about recoil, everyone says its very snappy.

The 7 rem mag I shot was a little under 9 lbs and shooting 150 gr bullets. It honestly didn't bother me a bit. Would 7 PRC with a brake be comparable or maybe even less recoil? Assuming around the same weight.
 
Braked 7 PRC is going to be less recoil than a bare muzzle Rem Mag. Recoil is at similar levels between them of rifles weigh the same.
 
7prc and 7rm are twins. Just like the 300prc and 300 wm are twin and the 6.5 prc and 6.5-284 norma are twins. Same same - one just has factory ammo with heavy for caliber high bc bullets.
 
7prc and 7rm are twins. Just like the 300prc and 300 wm are twin and the 6.5 prc and 6.5-284 norma are twins. Same same - one just has factory ammo with heavy for caliber high bc bullets.
the 300 prc is like 10% more energy than the 300wsm/wm, they're not quite in the same boat, that said, with a brake i certainly can not tell a diff between the various magnums and neither feel all that bad on my shoulder.

i had a stock tikka unbraked 300wm a while back and THAT definitely put a hurting on my shoulder!
 
7prc and 7rm are twins. Just like the 300prc and 300 wm are twin and the 6.5 prc and 6.5-284 norma are twins. Same same - one just has factory ammo with heavy for caliber high bc bullets.
That's what I thought! I'm just having a hard time believing it because the 7 rem mag recoil was much more mild than I expected from people complaining online. And this was a no break, no recoil pad, Ruger m77. Are people just pansies?
 
Back
Top