6.5 creed magnum

[BBob]

Here’s from some testing Short Action put up the other day.

As far as the 130VLD goes the velocity there isn't much to write home about. RL-16 will do that in a std case.

 

[Frozenlead]

I agree. Seems kind of low to be seeing bolt lift signs if the factory loads are 80kpsi. From what I can figure, GRT shows that load at only around 66kpsi.

 

[wilkup]

Here’s from some testing Short Action put up the other day.
View attachment 1081411View attachment 1081412

Did they share what length barrel they were shooting from cuz if it’s not possible to hit the velocities I’ve seen JVB hitting with the pre-factory stuff on his video I’ll be a bit disappointed. I’d really love to load the new 124fr Apex Afterburners in a suppressed 18” barrel as a dedicated mountain gun and hitting 2950-3050’ would be tough for me to beat on a build like that.

 

[Xycod]

How does this differ from safe practices for standard brass cased ammo?

Possibly less room for error, Murphys law.

 

[Frozenlead]

Did they share what length barrel they were shooting from cuz if it’s not possible to hit the velocities I’ve seen JVB hitting with the pre-factory stuff on his video I’ll be a bit disappointed. I’d really love to load the new 124fr Apex Afterburners in a suppressed 18” barrel as a dedicated mountain gun and hitting 2950-3050’ would be tough for me to beat on a build like that.

They didn’t share any barrel or rifle specs when they posted up that clip. From what I could see in GRT , those speeds/powder seemed to align with a 24” barrel.

 

[Castle Rock]

Possibly less room for error, Murphys law.

A stronger case would allow more room for error

 

[STXB245]

Did they share what length barrel they were shooting from cuz if it’s not possible to hit the velocities I’ve seen JVB hitting with the pre-factory stuff on his video I’ll be a bit disappointed. I’d really love to load the new 124fr Apex Afterburners in a suppressed 18” barrel as a dedicated mountain gun and hitting 2950-3050’ would be tough for me to beat on a build like that.

It was a 16.5” barrel.

 

[One300wsm]

Clear. But velocity and the mass of the ejecta (bullet + powder) still defines recoil. I doubt the difference in powder weight is sufficient to offset the increase in velocity. I would have said it’s a given that it’ll still recoil more than a standard creedmoor. Maybe less than a PRC, but still more than a creedmoor. In other words, from a performance standpoint id think this is a “low recoiling PRC”, not a “fast creedmoor”.

The recoil is captured in that special high pressure case .

 

[Treelineasassin]

Interesting SAC used 003 neck tension that I'm seeing in their Instagram post. That's far from the 0.0005 to 0.001 people say needs be used to keep the stiff steel case neck from damaging jackets from seating resistance.

 

[JohnJohnson]

It was a 16.5” barrel.

Oh then those are actually solid.

 

[wilkup]

It was a 16.5” barrel.

That is incredible performance for such a short barrel! I just ordered a couple 18” Proof barrels with 7.5” twist and can’t wait to start playing with reloads on this new case!
3000+ fps with the 124gr Afterburners is no longer a pipe dream but likely a reality now

 

[Treelineasassin]

That is incredible performance for such a short barrel! I just ordered a couple 18” Proof barrels with 7.5” twist and can’t wait to start playing with reloads on this new case!
3000+ fps with the 124gr Afterburners is no longer a pipe dream but likely a reality now

I've got a 20in 7.5tw 6.5mm pxt and an 18in 6mm 7.5tw pxt on order as well. I'll be running a nomad ti xc otb on them. If it fits over the barrel!

 

[KenLee]

Yep, and Im one of them. I love it too, and I’ll clearly benefit from it down the road if any bugs get worked out. This issue I and others are poking at is where its applied in this case, and what functional benefit I get out of that—I dont see any. Others might. ultimately this tech is really interesting and clearly could benefit everyone, and federal has no choice from an adoption perspective to introduce it in a mega-popular cartridge. But the actual real-world benefit is only where an existing cartridge is INSUFFICIENT. This forum has spent many years proving that the existing 6.5cm is plenty sufficient for larger game and at longer range than the vast majority of hunters have any business shooting. So its no surprise that folks who have figured out a 6.5cm is already sufficient arent WOWED by an unproven new tech to “upsize” it.
You have to be a “more is always better” guy, or it has to be applied to a cartridge that is widely considered insufficient, for this to really be exciting. Which is precisely why I said I would be more excited if it was offered in a 6.5grendel. Or a 7.62x39. Or a 6 or 6.5x45 from a 223rem case. Or a… You get the picture. A .308 would be another yawner for me, because for my uses its already plenty sufficient. This cartridge/tech may also be more interesting for folks who shoot copper.

Going from “sufficient” to “more sufficient” is cool, and at that point the tech is “promising” because the actual benefit for most people is theoretical at best. Taking “insufficient” and making it “sufficient” is where it starts getting exciting.

I'd drag out the stack of 270's and pick one to use before I bought a peak rifle. My old as* doesn't shoot over 500 yards anymore and the 270 appears to perform a little better with Superformance sst rounds for hunting.

 

[wilkup]

I've got a 20in 7.5tw 6.5mm pxt and an 18in 6mm 7.5tw pxt on order as well. I'll be running a nomad ti xc otb on them. If it fits over the barrel!

I didn’t know they were offering the PXT in 6mm! I’ve gone back and forth on my build and which Creedmoor to go with. Finally landed on 6.5 but only because those PXT barrels aren’t offered in 6mm that I could find.