A point to think about..here in Ohio i think if you hunt with a rifle you are limited to 2 rounds in the mag, whereas with a pistol you are not. I am thinking about building an AR in either 450 or 350 for hunting Ohio where I live, but if I do, I am seriously considering it being a pistol, not only so I can have more than 2 rounds in the mag, but also for compactness and weight. Not all of Ohio is farmland and there are woods that are as thick as anything you'll find in PA or anywhere else in the east.
I'm waiting until the 350 comes out and is around for a while to see what loads and bullets become available. I don't see why they made it 357 rather than 358 to take advantage of all the existing rifle bullets out there for rounds like the 35 Rem and 358 WIn. It made no sense to me why you make a round that touts being fast, but make it the diameter for 357 mag bullets. I am speculating it is so winchester has a monopoly on loads and bullets, but that doesn't seem like a good plan for success of the round. What components become available, bullets especially, will determine my decision. I'm trying to determine now if the CEB 160 ad 180 maximus bullets would be safe to fire through a 357 bore since they are mostly bore rider anyway.
I'm waiting until the 350 comes out and is around for a while to see what loads and bullets become available. I don't see why they made it 357 rather than 358 to take advantage of all the existing rifle bullets out there for rounds like the 35 Rem and 358 WIn. It made no sense to me why you make a round that touts being fast, but make it the diameter for 357 mag bullets. I am speculating it is so winchester has a monopoly on loads and bullets, but that doesn't seem like a good plan for success of the round. What components become available, bullets especially, will determine my decision. I'm trying to determine now if the CEB 160 ad 180 maximus bullets would be safe to fire through a 357 bore since they are mostly bore rider anyway.