hn0527
FNG
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2020
- Messages
- 21
I've inherited a few things over the years, and I'm planning to use them for hunting in the Intermountain West, primarily targeting elk and deer. I'm seeking advice on potential shortcomings in my setup and whether they’re significant or just minor concerns.
My Setup:
Barrett Fieldcraft 6.5 Creedmoor + Swaro Habicht 3-12x50
Pros: This is a great lightweight rifle for deer hunting in the mountains. I'm comfortable with its weight and have spent considerable time using it.
Cons: The only thing I don't love is the V-Plex reticle on the scope. It’s not ideal for holdovers, and my max comfortable range is 500 yards. I feel like the reticle could offer more versatility. The optic itself doesn't have sentimental value, and I’m worried that if I sell it, I might get a lower quality optic with a better reticle but lose out on the glass quality.
Question: Should I consider selling the Swarovski for an optic with a reticle that better suits my needs? Is the quality of the older glass still worth keeping, or would I be better off upgrading?
(yes I know in the photo the muzzle brake isn't timed. Waiting for my QD to arrive in the mail for a can I have)
Savage 110 UL in MDT LSS, .28 Nosler + Schmidt & Bender PMII
Pros: This is a solid, beefier setup for elk hunting or when weight isn’t a concern.
Cons: The PMII scope might be overkill for hunting, even though I don’t mind the weight. I’m torn because I don’t really want to sell it—it’s a great scope and just happens to be on this rifle.
Question: Am I being unrealistic or “stupid” for bringing the PMII on hunts, even if the weight doesn’t bother me?
Kimber Model 89 BGR 7mm Rem Mag + Zeiss
Pros: This rifle has great sentimental value and isn’t going anywhere. I didn't put the Zeiss on anything else, so it lives on this one.
Cons: I have the same issue with the V-Plex reticle as I do with the Barrett. I might be overreacting, but I’m considering whether it’s worth changing.
My Objectives:
1. Use the Barrett for ultralight hunting trips and be effective out to 500 yards. The rifle is dialed in, but I don’t love the optic.
2. Have a more robust setup for elk hunts or situations where weight isn’t a concern. The Savage fits this role, but I’m wondering if using the PMII is over the top.
I know this might seem a bit rambling, but I’m just looking for some advice on whether my concerns are valid and what steps I should consider. Any input would be appreciated!
My Setup:
Barrett Fieldcraft 6.5 Creedmoor + Swaro Habicht 3-12x50
Pros: This is a great lightweight rifle for deer hunting in the mountains. I'm comfortable with its weight and have spent considerable time using it.
Cons: The only thing I don't love is the V-Plex reticle on the scope. It’s not ideal for holdovers, and my max comfortable range is 500 yards. I feel like the reticle could offer more versatility. The optic itself doesn't have sentimental value, and I’m worried that if I sell it, I might get a lower quality optic with a better reticle but lose out on the glass quality.
Question: Should I consider selling the Swarovski for an optic with a reticle that better suits my needs? Is the quality of the older glass still worth keeping, or would I be better off upgrading?
(yes I know in the photo the muzzle brake isn't timed. Waiting for my QD to arrive in the mail for a can I have)
Savage 110 UL in MDT LSS, .28 Nosler + Schmidt & Bender PMII
Pros: This is a solid, beefier setup for elk hunting or when weight isn’t a concern.
Cons: The PMII scope might be overkill for hunting, even though I don’t mind the weight. I’m torn because I don’t really want to sell it—it’s a great scope and just happens to be on this rifle.
Question: Am I being unrealistic or “stupid” for bringing the PMII on hunts, even if the weight doesn’t bother me?
Kimber Model 89 BGR 7mm Rem Mag + Zeiss
Pros: This rifle has great sentimental value and isn’t going anywhere. I didn't put the Zeiss on anything else, so it lives on this one.
Cons: I have the same issue with the V-Plex reticle as I do with the Barrett. I might be overreacting, but I’m considering whether it’s worth changing.
My Objectives:
1. Use the Barrett for ultralight hunting trips and be effective out to 500 yards. The rifle is dialed in, but I don’t love the optic.
2. Have a more robust setup for elk hunts or situations where weight isn’t a concern. The Savage fits this role, but I’m wondering if using the PMII is over the top.
I know this might seem a bit rambling, but I’m just looking for some advice on whether my concerns are valid and what steps I should consider. Any input would be appreciated!