.223 for bear, mountain goat, deer, elk, and moose.

[mwoolsey5]

**** chat gpt. Stop using AI bullshit for stuff like this.

Genuinely asking—what specifically do you think is wrong with using AI for a thought experiment like this?

I completely understand the difference between estimated numbers and real pressure-tested data. If someone presented those velocities as fact, I’d be skeptical too. But this was clearly a speculative discussion about what a hypothetical .223 +Peak might look like.

I’ve actually used AI quite a bit when exploring handload ideas, and when I compare its predictions to published data or loads I’ve tested myself, it’s generally been surprisingly close. Not perfect, obviously, but often close enough to be useful for discussion.

So I’m curious—do you disagree with the concept of using AI at all, or do you think the specific velocity estimates are unrealistic? If it’s the latter, what numbers would you expect instead?

 

[TBoschma]

Was just looking at those... whats the accuracy and extraction like with those?

accuracy is decent seems to be able to group just at a inch. Ill have to do a legit 20 shot group and post it here.