.223 for bear, mountain goat, deer, elk, and moose.

It's not a matter of ethics. Common sense will tell anyone that a larger caliber will be more effective than a smaller one. Otherwise we'd all be hunting with .22 LR's or better yet, .177 air rifles.

Again, I ask, what's the point? So far, nobody has answered that.

Welp, I'm off to hunt rhinos with a blowgun, just to see if it can be done. Wish me luck!

It’s not common sense. It’s a position taken in what people think would be the case because they’re missing many factors that come into play when it comes to terminal performance. The biggest bullet failures I’ve seen on game was a 300 RUM shooting 180 grain bullets. Bullet diameter is a minimal part of the equation for bullet performance. The two biggest factors are impact velocity and bullet construction. These need to be paired together to produce the desired results. The problem with this is we have 100% control over the bullet we choose so we get the construction we want. What we can’t completely control is impact velocity. Rarely, if ever will a hunter know the exact distance they will be shooting and thus we can’t control impact velocity as it’s dependent on shot distance. From what I’ve seen from following this whole thread is the 77 TMK has a broad impact velocity range where it has been proven to perform great on game from a 223. I have my doubts on its ability to perform the same at close ranges if it’s used in a 22 creedmore or a 220 swift at much higher velocities. The point is that this combination has been proven to be effective on game when used within its impact velocity window. Every combination in every caliber has an optimum velocity window so larger calibers also have these limitations. On the edges of these velocity windows the combinations can still produce the desired results but if we stray too far we can have complete bullet failures and lost game which is what happened with the 300 RUM example I referenced earlier. So to answer your question of what’s the point? The point is this is a proven combination, it’s effective. What else should we be looking for when trying to take game? Many people are choosing this combination for just that reason. I’ve never even fired a TMK but after seeing the results here I’m considering using it, while not in a 223 or 5.56 but in another smaller caliber at approximately the same muzzle velocity. I have tons of other options of larger calibers but I’m considering this combination for Wisconsin whitetails purely from a performance standpoint. I have nothing to prove by using a “smaller” caliber. I’m considering this because of the examples shown in this thread make me believe it’ll serve my purposes perfectly from zero yards out to the maximum range I’d ever expect to be shooting a deer and that’s something that has been a struggle with many of the larger calibers. Sure they’ll perform well at a distance where impact velocity is slower but finding a bullet that’ll perform from zero to max shot distance is not always an easy task.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I wouldnt want a .223 to fight off a large brown, polar, or grizzly bear but it would sure beat a sharp stick.

I agree but there’s also lots of calibers I’d have no problem shooting one of these bears with that I wouldn’t want to use to fight one off. I see hunting cartridges and bear protection cartridges as two different categories.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Tikka t3x stainless 223 chopped to 18”
Black hills 77gr tmk
MV 2758
White tail doe roughly 130 lb at 147 yards
DRT

Shot was taken just before last light. She lined up broadside and I placed the shot through the right shoulder. She dropped dead immediately. The round was resting on the inside of the hide on the left shoulder. My buddies hunting nearby were laughing because they heard the suppressed shot and an exceptionally loud meat slap.

No autopsy photos because I was in a rush to help up a buddy after he shot a buck and couldn’t find it. It did spark a great conversation with a few people back at camp who previously argued soft point bullets were more effective, despite losing deer or missing on this trip. I think the three deer I shot and the manner of which they died swayed some guys.
 
My boy got another one this morning same as yesterday. This was a small 8pt. 16" Tikka 223 with 77tmks over 24.2gr varget in starline brass. He bucked when shot and we watched him fall 25yds past that. For southern whitetails, not sure what else you would need. I think I'll be building a left handed version with a Maven instead of the trijicon.

Entrance wound under the shoulder and exit through the offside shoulder.
 

Attachments

  • 20241103_104118.jpg
    20241103_104118.jpg
    307.4 KB · Views: 97
  • 20241103_101625.jpg
    20241103_101625.jpg
    214.2 KB · Views: 97
My boy got another one this morning same as yesterday. This was a small 8pt. 16" Tikka 223 with 77tmks over 24.2gr varget in starline brass. He bucked when shot and we watched him fall 25yds past that. For southern whitetails, not sure what else you would need. I think I'll be building a left handed version with a Maven instead of the trijicon.

Entrance wound under the shoulder and exit through the offside shoulder.
If I could get consistent exits, I would keep using them. Unfortunately, I’m 100% at no exits on deer I’ve shot. My search continues for a better bullet for my 223.
 
Long ass thread and very interesting with solid results. Haven't read through the whole thing but checked out many of the pics from the “cheat sheet”. Seems like a lot of 77 TMK results.

Any use the old 75 gr Amax? I still have a ton of those sitting around and have them loaded to 2900 fps out of my Tikkler. If I can get a draw, I'd love to be able to gun one through an elk or Muley. They shoot lights out so reluctant to go stock up on TMKs if they're both basically apples-to-apples.
 
If I could get consistent exits, I would keep using them. Unfortunately, I’m 100% at no exits on deer I’ve shot. My search continues for a better bullet for my 223.

What's your impact velocity been? I mean we have basically been point blank range but we have a 16" barrel.
 
It’s not common sense. It’s a position taken in what people think would be the case because they’re missing many factors that come into play when it comes to terminal performance. The biggest bullet failures I’ve seen on game was a 300 RUM shooting 180 grain bullets. Bullet diameter is a minimal part of the equation for bullet performance. The two biggest factors are impact velocity and bullet construction. These need to be paired together to produce the desired results. The problem with this is we have 100% control over the bullet we choose so we get the construction we want. What we can’t completely control is impact velocity. Rarely, if ever will a hunter know the exact distance they will be shooting and thus we can’t control impact velocity as it’s dependent on shot distance. From what I’ve seen from following this whole thread is the 77 TMK has a broad impact velocity range where it has been proven to perform great on game from a 223. I have my doubts on its ability to perform the same at close ranges if it’s used in a 22 creedmore or a 220 swift at much higher velocities. The point is that this combination has been proven to be effective on game when used within its impact velocity window. Every combination in every caliber has an optimum velocity window so larger calibers also have these limitations. On the edges of these velocity windows the combinations can still produce the desired results but if we stray too far we can have complete bullet failures and lost game which is what happened with the 300 RUM example I referenced earlier. So to answer your question of what’s the point? The point is this is a proven combination, it’s effective. What else should we be looking for when trying to take game? Many people are choosing this combination for just that reason. I’ve never even fired a TMK but after seeing the results here I’m considering using it, while not in a 223 or 5.56 but in another smaller caliber at approximately the same muzzle velocity. I have tons of other options of larger calibers but I’m considering this combination for Wisconsin whitetails purely from a performance standpoint. I have nothing to prove by using a “smaller” caliber. I’m considering this because of the examples shown in this thread make me believe it’ll serve my purposes perfectly from zero yards out to the maximum range I’d ever expect to be shooting a deer and that’s something that has been a struggle with many of the larger calibers. Sure they’ll perform well at a distance where impact velocity is slower but finding a bullet that’ll perform from zero to max shot distance is not always an easy task.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The post you quoted was from 5 years ago by a guy that I think has been banned for a while now.
 
Long ass thread and very interesting with solid results. Haven't read through the whole thing but checked out many of the pics from the “cheat sheet”. Seems like a lot of 77 TMK results.

Any use the old 75 gr Amax? I still have a ton of those sitting around and have them loaded to 2900 fps out of my Tikkler. If I can get a draw, I'd love to be able to gun one through an elk or Muley. They shoot lights out so reluctant to go stock up on TMKs if they're both basically apples-to-apples.
They're killers. I have them to swap too if I ever run out of 77tmk
 
On Saturday I got up at 5am, burned some toast, had a coffee, and climbed a hill. Spotted a chamois from the ridge top and dropped down to have a closer look. Nanny and kid, leave them alone. Had a good hard look at a patch of scrub and eventually located a hind bedded, visible through a small gap in the vegetables. Got a good position with my schedium on top of a tripod and shot her.

20241102_121503.jpg

80gr ELDM, 330m, impact V about 2200fps. Shot was 27⁰ downhill angle, quartering to. She ran 10 metres downhill and died. Bullet entered high shoulder, shattered the scapula, broke a rib, went through 1 lung and the heart, and ended up in the gut cavity. She still ran despite the broken bone, it is my observation that breaking front legs doesn't do a lot to stop them running, and heart shots often run.

Knife pointing to entry
20241102_123835.jpg

Wound on the inside of the shoulder
1000088776.jpg

And correspondingly on the ribs
20241102_124241.jpg

Lung wound channel. I gave them a rinse in the creek. Big permanent wound cavity and a large zone of extravasation.
20241102_123740.jpg

Heart
20241102_123821.jpg

Inside rib cage
20241102_125611.jpg

Bullet jacket & core as found
20241102_130619.jpg
 
Back
Top