.223 for bear, deer, elk and moose.

Ryan Avery

Admin
Staff member
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
8,723
The ELD-M is more explosive than the Berger especially the target Berger’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JMDsir

FNG
Joined
Oct 10, 2013
Messages
1
How about this same bullet out of a 224 Valkyrie?
I appreciate all that I've learned from this site, and have never posted. Hopefully this will contribute a bit to the thread...
The past few months I've been shooting the 88 grain ELD-M from a bolt action 224 Valkyrie. 20" barrel with 1 in 7 twist. MV 2660.

Limited experience, but so far I have had good results on whitetail deer in Texas. Shot a doe in the crease (slightly higher than anticipated at last light) from 145 yards that ran approximately 60 yards. Very little blood but easy to find.

Next shot was a doe at 430 yards. Wind pushed shot slightly forward, bullet impacted just forward of middle of shoulder. Quarter sized exit on opposite shoulder. Deer ran 15 yards and kicked twice then dead. Not a lot of blood, but enough to follow if I had needed to.

Another doe at 100 or so yards. Quartering away, bullet entered behind shoulder and exited opposite shoulder just forward of center. 25 yard death run downhill with very strong blood trail. See attached pic of exit. Note: Dog was not needed for any of these trails, but he's always with me at the ranch!

On another note, both my boys killed their first bucks this year with a 223! One just turned 6 and the other 8.
 

Attachments

  • Doe 88 ELD-M.jpeg
    Doe 88 ELD-M.jpeg
    198.3 KB · Views: 130
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
2,127
Yes- not sure if the tmk would enjoy 3500+fps.
I use 88 eld-m around 3300 but just for targets and coyotes. It's pretty explosive on dogs though

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Was thinking the 85gr Berger hybrids! What twist rate are you running?
 

amassi

WKR
Joined
May 26, 2018
Messages
3,658
My plan for the next rifle was a 6 creed that would eventually be my boys... but this talk has made me want to build a 22 cm for 77 gr LRXs.
I'd stick with the 6mm, better bc if you want to sling lead free barnes

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 

Jim1187

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
206
Location
New Brunswick, Canada
How well does Hornady's 60 grain HP work? I have a pile and they shoot fantastic in every .223 and .22-250 I have loaded them in but have not had anything but crows and woodchucks allow me to try them on. I am going to load some for coyotes and the lack of components, in particular my favorite Speer gold dots, up here got me wondering. In the days before we knew better and had better options the SP version worked pretty reliably on game curious if they compare. I suppose if I have to I can slum a 60 grain partition or 75 grain Scirocco since I have some on hand if supplies don't improve by the time I feel the need to go "stunt shooting" again.
 

Lawnboi

WKR
Joined
Mar 2, 2012
Messages
7,803
Location
North Central Wi
22 cal TMK are on sale at midway and in stock. Just grabbed another 500 of the 60s for 16 cents a pop I figure they will make good prairie dog/coyote and range billets.
 

Blaw

WKR
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
346
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Well you SOBs talked me into it! Haha!!

d1387371ece1fd7837e7232dc0febb43.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yea me too...Cant hunt big game around here with them tho unless something has changed
pumped for the practice...maybe head shot some small game/coyotes

20201220_222257.jpg
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,465
Four elk were killed with 77gr TMK’s from 223’s this year.

1st- 258 yards. Onside shoulder was broken and a near a total loss, less than 5yd traveled after hit-
27235D2D-99DD-48AF-83AD-CFF98D745AEF.jpeg

Offside, significant damage to scapula. Excellent damage to lungs, with 3”+ permanent wound channel through chest-
F5EA6B5D-85E2-415E-BAA5-1055496C76FF.jpeg



2nd, 284 yards, onside shoulder with significant damage to meat and scapula, 2”+ permanent wound channels through chest, 50’ish yards traveled-
83361D17-B75C-4114-89DE-E6E5375462FE.jpeg

FAEFF3B4-7B44-476B-A554-16546C0F358C.jpeg



3rd- 195 yards, onside shoulder, traveled 113yards, lots of blood-
E477B94C-1EA9-414B-8137-35E114DD4923.jpeg


Ribs- you could almost fit your fist through the hole into the chest. Lots of damage with 4”+ permanent wound channel-
C2F7F7B6-7B8A-4526-B4B0-BE681094BC3F.jpeg



4th- 427 yards, onside shoulder was broken, flopped for less than 50 yards and stopped with head down and butt in air, second hit broke spine-
7B726FA6-17AB-4F29-B4DA-E90AB50E255C.jpeg

Ribs behind scapula, and around a 1.5” permanent wound channel through the chest-
5D1FF885-E8B3-4C9D-95D2-4FDE4618E5CC.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,465
As I’ve stated from the beginning- for me, the 223/77gr TMK combo is completely sufficient for killing quickly and without fuss, any animal in NA save maybe a Bison, to approximately 1,900fps impact speed, which is around 450 yards. From 0-300’ish yards (above 2,200fps impact) wounds are absolutely devastating, and no one has wanted “more”. From about 300 to 450 yards (2,200 to 1,900fps impact) wounds resemble a lot of standard C&C bullets from 308/270/3006/etc.

Penetration will be 18-22” unless major bones are hit, then impact speed comes into play. On deer expect exits unless major bone is hit. On antelopes expect exits on any normal shot. On bear, exits will be about 50/50. On elk, expect bullets to make it through the near side Humerus/scapula, and to the offside ribs.
 

CorbLand

WKR
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
6,905
Shit. This is really making me second guess getting the 6.5PRC for my wife...may just have to order a .223...shucks.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
1,287
Four elk were killed with 77gr TMK’s from 223’s this year.

1st- 258 yards. Onside shoulder was broken and a near a total loss, less than 5yd traveled after hit-
View attachment 244994

Offside, significant damage to scapula. Excellent damage to lungs, with 3”+ permanent wound channel through chest-
View attachment 244996



2nd, 284 yards, onside shoulder with significant damage to meat and scapula, 2”+ permanent wound channels through chest, 50’ish yards traveled-
View attachment 244998

View attachment 244999



3rd- 195 yards, onside shoulder, traveled 113yards, lots of blood-
View attachment 245000


Ribs- you could almost fit your fist through the hole into the chest. Lots of damage with 4”+ permanent wound channel-
View attachment 245001



4th- 427 yards, onside shoulder was broken, flopped for less than 50 yards and stopped with head down and butt in air, second shot broke spine-
View attachment 245002

Ribs behind scapula, and around a 1.5” permanent wound channel through the chest-
View attachment 245004

Were these bulls or cows?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,465
Were these bulls or cows?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Those were cows. Though I haven’t seen anything that says it matters. A bull will have an inch or two more muscle on the forelegs, the scapula and humerus aren’t different enough to matter.
 
Top