1911’s in general, 9mm versions specifically

No, not really.

Some Might end up being relatively close from a grip standpoint. But the weight and trigger designs make it completely different shooting experiences.

Plenty of Poly, striker fire pistols that shoot well. But they are not the same experience.
 
For the general population as a subcompact EDC, would something like a kimber micro 9 make more sense than say a snubnose ruger lcr 9mm?

Asked differently, does the improved shootability benefit of the 1911 platform diminish enough in such a small package that the carrying comfort of a snubnose wheel gun makes more sense for EDC?
 
For the general population as a subcompact EDC, would something like a kimber micro 9 make more sense than say a snubnose ruger lcr 9mm?

Asked differently, does the improved shootability benefit of the 1911 platform diminish enough in such a small package that the carrying comfort of a snubnose wheel gun makes more sense for EDC?
Personally I haven't shot much in the way of subcompacts, never a kimber or wheel subcompact. So i got nothing....

I won't go any smaller then a compact in the CZ P10C, Glock G19 type of size range when CC. But that's just personal for me.
 
If I am going staccato. Flat or curved trigger. Does it really matter?
 
If I am going staccato. Flat or curved trigger. Does it really matter?

I don't think it matters.


The most important thing for most people really is just getting the shortest one you can. I can't recall seeing anyone, regardless of hand size or finger length, do better with longer triggers. I like the "feel" of longer triggers, but that's a siren's song if there ever was one - it tends to induce shot groupings left, or low and left. There are videos from some top makers that tell you how to fit the trigger to your finger length by measurement, but, again, I just don't think that usually matches up with reality for what produces the best performance.

I've had both flat and curved, and while flat seems to "feel" better, I can say it definitely doesn't shoot better, at least not for me. It's a wash. I just picked up the shortest flat and the shortest curved I could for my Staccato C, but only did so to be able to personally see which one would actually be shortest. Often, that's the curved. But I'm thinking about trying what Form seems to do, in shortening one of them even further.

That said, there is a theory out there, that the more curved you can get a trigger, the better, because it puts the pad of your finger into the curve more consistently. There may be something to it, but I suspect you'd probably have to be at a truly elite level of shooting for there to be any measurable difference at all. And, that it probably wouldn't be in any kind of action/practical pistol shooting. More of a precision rifle thing, if there's any merit at all.
 
Is that lead, almost completely filling the rifling?

Yea she's pretty plugged up. Probly never woulda noticed if it wasnt peeling off the barrel like that :ROFLMAO:

Good news is that that ammo is about used up!!! Probly wont buy any more ammo from those guys.
 
Damn man, that's a jaw-dropper. The only time I've seen pistol barrels get leaded up badly, is some variation of it being cast-lead with an alloy that's too soft, and/or the bullets not being lubricated. If those bullets are jacketed, I'd have to suspect the manufacturer used some pretty soft lead in the core, with the base exposed.
 
Not jacketed. Just that hightek coating on the lead. Supposed to just be a 124gr @ 980fps. So thinking super soft lead or undersized

I shoot a lot of lead. Never an issue prior. Dont think I ever noticed this stuff. As, as shitty as it has been, I've just been burning a handful or two at a time, trying to get it used up. I suffered through about 200-225ish rounds today.
 
Made a few minor upgrades to the Tisas Carry B9R I picked up a while back. Short trigger, wood grips and the Wilson bulletproof extractor.

Next up is Dawson Precision sights and then finding a good range holster that is made for a 4.25” 1911 with a rail. For now, a holster designed for a full size 5” 1911 with a rail seems to be the best option I’ve found.

IMG_1957.jpeg

IMG_1956.jpeg
 
Made a few minor upgrades to the Tisas Carry B9R I picked up a while back. Short trigger, wood grips and the Wilson bulletproof extractor.

Next up is Dawson Precision sights and then finding a good range holster that is made for a 4.25” 1911 with a rail. For now, a holster designed for a full size 5” 1911 with a rail seems to be the best option I’ve found.

View attachment 997246

View attachment 997247

Wood caliber? Is that even allowed on a Tisas? 🤣. Looks good!
 
I also bought a Tisas a few months ago based on this thread and it has been eye opening. I’ve pretty much only ever shot Glocks, and I’m not much of pistol shooter anyway, but I’m a believer in 1911’s now. My wife and I both shoot this way better, even against full size G17. Per Forms recommendation I added the WC extractor, magwell, front strap, and Mecgar magazines. The grips were my idea but somewhat necessary with the magwell and front strap. I only have around 250 rounds through it but it hasn’t had any issues.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6298.jpeg
    IMG_6298.jpeg
    632.6 KB · Views: 74
Made a few minor upgrades to the Tisas Carry B9R I picked up a while back. Short trigger, wood grips and the Wilson bulletproof extractor.

Next up is Dawson Precision sights and then finding a good range holster that is made for a 4.25” 1911 with a rail. For now, a holster designed for a full size 5” 1911 with a rail seems to be the best option I’ve found.

View attachment 997246

View attachment 997247
I debated getting Dawson precision sights for my Tisas, but was told when talking with them they don’t make any that will fit. Let me know if you end up getting some and if they just need some modification to fit.
 
I debated getting Dawson precision sights for my Tisas, but was told when talking with them they don’t make any that will fit. Let me know if you end up getting some and if they just need some modification to fit.

Most of the dovetail cuts on 1911s fall into just a couple of categories (Novak, etc), so determining which cut the Tisas uses will tell you what your sight options are, and then it's just a matter of googling sight manufacturers building to that cut.
 
Most of the dovetail cuts on 1911s fall into just a couple of categories (Novak, etc), so determining which cut the Tisas uses will tell you what your sight options are, and then it's just a matter of googling sight manufacturers building to that cut.
Yeah what Dawson said is tisas is a “Novak“ style cut. It’s not the exact same fit as a standard Novak cut but its own variant. So I’m sure they just told me it won’t “fit” because there would need to be some modifications to make it fit.
 
Yeah what Dawson said is tisas is a “Novak“ style cut. It’s not the exact same fit as a standard Novak cut but its own variant. So I’m sure they just told me it won’t “fit” because there would need to be some modifications to make it fit.
I've put Dawson fiber optic fronts on two different 1911s and each required a decent amount of filing to get them to fit. They're pretty awesome once they're on there, though...
 
Back
Top