16x Fixed Power SWFA Scope for Deer Hunting

asp762

FNG
Joined
Nov 23, 2024
Messages
5
I have a 16x fixed power SWFA for a suppressed deer hunting rifle and based on some research, that might be overkill. I wanted to know if that is the case, would an offset T-2 Aimpoint bridge the gap provided it is zeroed at 50-100 yards? Anyone hunt in this manner or am I an idiot? Picture of successful load development:

GROUPS.jpg
 
OP
A

asp762

FNG
Joined
Nov 23, 2024
Messages
5
Ok, sounds like Leupold Mark AR 1 1.5-4x20mm Firedot SPR or Atibal 1-8 would be better suited than 16x with offset T-2.
 

Geewhiz

WKR
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
2,567
Location
SW MT
I have a 16x on a rifle that I use for mule deer hunting. Shots range from 0-600 yards in mostly fairly open country. I really like the scope and feel that it is perfectly sufficient for those animals at those ranges in the conditions and topography I hunt. I would never recommend a 6x for a 500 yard shot. That sounds crazy to me, but to each their own.


This is my experience and it does not apply to whitetail hunting at close ranges.
 

NickyD

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Sep 24, 2020
Messages
159
Location
Denver, CO
I have a 6-24x and think the 6x on the low end is too high. I’ve been wanting to get a red dot for 0-100 yard shots. My next scope will have a low end in the 2-4x range
 
OP
A

asp762

FNG
Joined
Nov 23, 2024
Messages
5
What is your scope budget? Those dont typically come to mind as having a great track record. That being said I do not have any experience with them either.
$0. I have a Nightforce 5.5-25 which sits on a .338 Lapua make Sako TRG 42 that will probably never come off. So in the meantime, I will use a LPVO or a 4-16 I have laying around. Not sure I need to buy more glass.

Can you point me to the review where this lack of track record is addressed? Not saying I don’t believe you, I just want to read it myself since I haven’t found anything that supports that claim.

Thanks
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2020
Messages
404
$0. I have a Nightforce 5.5-25 which sits on a .338 Lapua make Sako TRG 42 that will probably never come off. So in the meantime, I will use a LPVO or a 4-16 I have laying around. Not sure I need to buy more glass.

Can you point me to the review where this lack of track record is addressed? Not saying I don’t believe you, I just want to read it myself since I haven’t found anything that supports that claim.

Thanks

Not a lot of lpvo there but you can see which brands pass. swfa, trijicon, nightforce
 

Matt5266

WKR
Joined
Sep 19, 2021
Messages
672
Location
SW Idaho
The above post will get you started. You can also utilize the search bar at the top. As I said I dont have any experience with either of those scopes you mentioned. Some guys like Leopold's but you wont find a lot of love here for them in general.
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,258
Magnification isn’t one size fits all - how you hunt, where you hunt and what you hunt comes into play. I use a 12x for open country antelope and deer, and in many places with almost zero chance of a sub 100 yard shot, 16x wouldn’t be a handicap. 16x or 20x is an ideal range for varmints, and it trains muscle memory to getting the critter in the narrow field of view, which is the main shortcoming of higher magnification. Most guys wouldn’t starve if 16x were the only scope. Many folks who think a high power fixed scope is crazy, have a variable that is shot turned way up 99% of the time. *chuckle*

Way too much emphasis is put into shot spotting - if there is a chance of missing something the size of a big game animal, don’t take the shot.

Having said all that, the shooter has to recognize the limitations of this choice and not be surprised if an easy shot can’t be made up close. The amount someone shoots a high power fixed scope is directly related to its feasibility. For big game, there’s also little to be gained above 8x or 10x. Younger eyes can even shoot 6x to well below 1/2 MOA. For a meat gun use whatever scope seems like fun.
 
OP
A

asp762

FNG
Joined
Nov 23, 2024
Messages
5
Magnification isn’t one size fits all - how you hunt, where you hunt and what you hunt comes into play. I use a 12x for open country antelope and deer, and in many places with almost zero chance of a sub 100 yard shot, 16x wouldn’t be a handicap. 16x or 20x is an ideal range for varmints, and it trains muscle memory to getting the critter in the narrow field of view, which is the main shortcoming of higher magnification. Most guys wouldn’t starve if 16x were the only scope. Many folks who think a high power fixed scope is crazy, have a variable that is shot turned way up 99% of the time. *chuckle*

Way too much emphasis is put into shot spotting - if there is a chance of missing something the size of a big game animal, don’t take the shot.

Having said all that, the shooter has to recognize the limitations of this choice and not be surprised if an easy shot can’t be made up close. The amount someone shoots a high power fixed scope is directly related to its feasibility. For big game, there’s also little to be gained above 8x or 10x. Younger eyes can even shoot 6x to well below 1/2 MOA. For a meat gun use whatever scope seems like fun.
That makes sense. I believe some responses are failing to consider I have an aimpoint T-2 on an offset mount zeroed for 50 yards to address the other end of the spectrum for distance.
 
Top