eLightfoot
WKR
Asking those who have either switched from the 15xslc to 14x nl pure or have used both a decent amount. Are the NL 14s worth the extra cheddar based on optical quality alone? Not based on weight savings or form factor.
This ^^^ every bit of usable clarity and field of view catches the ear flicks and tail wags, especially when it is in the peripheral vision. Tweety birds are always catching my attention as I am glassing. I watch for movement as much as deer bits.I switched from 15 SLCs to 15 Meoptas.
This winter I switched to 14 pures. In comparing both side by side on tripods, the biggest difference is finding animals/movement in the peripherals with the pures. It’s noticeable.
On coues deer here in AZ specifically they are the better bino.
Did you like the Meoptas better than the SLC's? Why did you switch?I switched from 15 SLCs to 15 Meoptas.
This winter I switched to 14 pures. In comparing both side by side on tripods, the biggest difference is finding animals/movement in the peripherals with the pures. It’s noticeable.
On coues deer here in AZ specifically they are the better bino.
I did.Did you like the Meoptas better than the SLC's? Why did you switch?
It's not “pop” that the 14s have over the 15s. To me, it is shadow/low light resolution. Animals seem easier to see in shadows/low light with the 14s than with the 15s. The field of view is also ridiculous.I’ve heard deer “pop” more with the 14nl’s
Any opinions here? A problem I have glassing is my brain forgets to analyze what I’m looking at after a couple hours glassing the same stuff. If nothing is moving I have trouble spotting. With the 10s I have, I have to force myself to look extra hard to find anything difficult. Hoping the NL’s would help with some of that. I’m talking strictly like 4+ hours of glassing the same spot.