I listened to their podcasts and I thought it was great to listen to, but I do agree they didn’t give examples of tested barrels. I think testing two of the same barrels throughout the life of the barrel would be great, with one being cleaned and one not.
I noticed some weird things happening...
I have a DD Lti and it has been great with zero issues. I do not have any first-round impact shifts to speak of. I will test it out on a different rifle possibly this weekend. It is currently on a 20" 7prc.
I find this very interesting. I wonder if other guys with C6 barrels can chime in if they have seen some extra unexpected speed with theirs too. That’s a good 100fps faster than I would expect it to produce.
How would a pair of Revic Acura rangefinding binos compare in glass quality to something in the class of Mave B1.2 binos or Vortex Razor HDs, all things being equal? 10x42s. Im just curious if there is a downgrade in glass quality with the rangefinding binos.
Have you guys done any seating depth testing? I just loaded one group at a COAL of 2.770 and one at 2.815 and it liked the 2.815 better. I think this combo can still do better tho.
I’m barely a rifle hunter. I have always shot rifles for fun. But, my most accurate rifle is a Browning in 7prc and it’s very easy to shoot suppressed.
Here is a link to the trigger. I am selling this for a buddy. $150 shipped OBO
https://www.eurooptic.com/TriggerTech-AR15-Adaptable-Flat-Blk-Blk-Two-Stage-Trigger-AR0-TBB-25-NNF.aspx
I said, or at least I thought I said, transferring energy is a byproduct. The bullet has energy when flying in the air. It uses that energy to expand a bullet . But the expansion mechanism and its expansion is based on velocity. The same bullet in different calibers and grain weights will have...