The real frustration here is by people who want to live in a state with crappy hunting and hunt elsewhere. That’s not how it works. Move to a state with good hunting if that’s what you value. This will become more and more of an issue as more guys back east seek to go west and essentially every...
True, there's a small chance it could change. However, if you spend a lot of time reviewing constitutional law, I think you'll see that once a decision like this has been nailed down in precedent, it would be very unlikely to change. One million is real conservative.
Nonresidents can be discriminated against in the sale of hunting licenses and tags. It's very well settled law. Get used to it and you'll stop beating your head against a wall. Maybe with a cool million in your pocket for attorney fees and lobbying you could have a small chance of changing that.
The state manages wildlife. If you want to hunt in a state, live there or you’re at the mercy of rules related to nonresidents. It’s Federal land arguments are not persuasive at all.
Hi all, Knight has a 52 caliber Bighorn on sale. Is 52 a common caliber or would I have a hard time finding supplies for it? Anything else I should be concerned about with that particular muzzie? I’m thinking about pulling the trigger.
We've seen lots of bears spotted this spring at one of my spots. A good guy on here who I've chatted with took down his first bear late last week, a pretty chocolate. I'm not going to call him out individually but it'd be cool if he posted as a first time bear hunter.
That’s my experience in Idaho. Once there’s been a lot of hunters in the field in September the bear sightings get slim as they move into cover and feed around creek bottoms.