I have pair that was a replacement for some 8.5x42s that were faulty out of the box.
I've been pretty impressed with them, not used them hunting much as 10x is too much IMO. But for spotting at shooting comps and spotting animals off tripod around home I've been happy with them.
Durability...
Drop test is discussed at the 44-47 minute mark.
As I expected, sounds like Maven haven't done anything special to get the scope to pass the test. Its just dumb luck that it passes whereas the same design from Tract doesn't.
I highly recommend skipping the first 44mins as they only spend a...
Kahles, ZCO, Swaro and Ziess all make scopes themselves but also outsource some of their models.
They are all European companies so any outsourced scopes will likely be labeled made in Japan or China.
It's very hard to know exactly where scopes are made in many instances, Leupold have some...
Both scopes are made by LOW (Light Optic Works) an OEM in Japan that makes scopes for many many companies. The Tract, Maven, and the Trijicon 2.5-15 are all made by LOW.
OEMs generally have a range of base model scopes that companies can choose from, for the most part the scopes will be the...
I can't offer much of a review, but I have these binos and find them rather excellent.
I've not experienced any optical issues, they are easy to get behind on a tripod, have a surprisingly good resolution (I don't have any alphas to compare against). I've used a variety of cheap/mid range binos...
Of the Slides known good scopes (SWFA, NF, Bushnell) the only one I have a reasonably amount of time behind is the Bushnell LRHS 4.5-18.
I haven't found that to have a tight eyebox, certainly not unuable like some scopes are. I haven't seen an unusable scope for many years now, most newer...
If you are wondering if there are variable scops that don't have tight eye boxes, then yes some are definitely better than others. Many are very forgiving.
Don't feel as though you need a fixed power to have a forgiving eyebox.
I can't however comment on the SWFA 3-15 as I haven’t used one.
Without knowing the accuracy of your rifle/ammo at those longer distances you can't rule out that the ultimate accuracy is holding you back.
But if you are getting erratic misses that you don't see at closer distances and you are always shooting across a deep canyon, I'd say wind is the big...
The problem is it they put something like the Maven SHR reticle in it the folks at Snipershide who want this for "tactical" purposes would be unhappy.
Personally I don't have an issue with tree reticles ever for hunting. I do however think this is the wrong reticle for this scope.
.2mil holds...
8x seems a bit low for target usage and to high for hunting.
A lightweight super wide FOV 6x scope would definitely be nice, like the SWFA but modernized.
Not sure how I feel about 3x scopes, maybe I‘d buy a lightweight FFP 3.5-10 or 4.5-14, but I can’t help but feel a 3.5-14 (4x) should be entirely possible.
I think a mashup of the TMR and PR2 would be good.
Leupold were meant to being doing something similar for the 2-10x30, but goodness knows when/if that’ll happen.
What questions did you have?
They must've been awful specific to get a response like that.
As far as I can tell Apex is a very small company that is only a few years old, I'd be suprised if they more then a couple of staff members.
I'd also guess that talking to the Engineer meant the OEM not...
The Burris XTR3 took 18months after annocement to turn up on the shelf.
The illuminated version 3 years.
It's barely been a week since this was announced.
He doesn't post much on SH though only on a few particular threads, certainly not enough to get into arguments.
I follow him on Locals, I have mentioned the drop tests a few times and he isn't that keen on them.
I think he had a run in with Form at a much earlier time, hence the pot shots.